Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The temporal bone is ideal for low-dose CT because of its intrinsic high contrast. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate image quality and radiation doses of a new low-dose versus a standard high-dose pediatric temporal bone CT protocol and to review dosimetric data from the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Image quality and radiation doses were compared for 38 low-dose (80 kV/90–110 mAs) and 16 high-dose (140 kV/170 mAs) temporal bone CT scans of infants to 5-year-old children. The CT visualization quality of 23 middle and inner ear structures was subjectively graded by 3 neuroradiologists and 3 otologists by using a 5-point scale with scores 1–2 indicating insufficient and scores 3–5 indicating sufficient image quality. Effective doses of local and literature-derived protocols were calculated from dosimetric data by using NRPB-SR250 software. RESULTS: Insufficient image-quality scores were more frequent in low-dose scans versus high-dose scans, but the difference was only statistically significant for otologists (6.0% versus 3.4%, P = .004) and not for neuroradiologists (1.2% versus 0.7%, P = .84). Image quality was critical for small structures (such as the stapes or lamella at the internal auditory canal fundus). Effective doses were 0.25–0.3 mSv for low-dose scans, 1.4–1.8 mSv for high-dose scans, and 0.9–2.6 mSv for literature-derived protocols. CONCLUSIONS: The image quality of the new low-dose protocol remains diagnostic for assessing middle and inner ear anatomy despite a 3- to 8-fold dose reduction over previous and literature-derived protocols. However, image quality of small structures is critical and may be perceived as insufficient. Abbreviations CTDI CT dose index CTDI vol volumetric CTDI CTDI c CTDI measured in the center CTDI p CTDI measured in the periphery CTDI w weighted CTDI D eff effective dose DLP dose-length product
American Journal of Neuroradiology – American Journal of Neuroradiology
Published: Sep 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.