Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/brill/origene-e-i-suoi-sostenitori-nei-concili-un-ammonimento-per-la-8iVQHZJzrF
References
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
- Publisher
- Brill
- Copyright
- Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
- ISSN
- 0003-5157
- eISSN
- 2589-0433
- DOI
- 10.30965/25890433-04901004
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
AbstractIn order to approach the Origenist crises through the category of “minority”, some remarks are needed. It is necessary to avoid any anachronistic projection of modern understanding on the past. But, at the same time, the epistemological challenge could be useful to go beyond historicism in contemporary Dogmengeschichte. The condemnation of Origenism in the mark of the 2nd Council of Constantinople, in fact, presents a deep difference with respect to the Three Chapters issue. The main question at stake was not merely the Emperor’s ecclesiastical politics in view of the unity of the Empire and of the Church. Having recourse to Christian Gnilka’s categories, it can be shown that the 6th century condemnations were the krisis of a chrêsis, that is a judgement on the use of Origen in (Evagrian) monasticism of that time.
Journal
Annuarium Historiae Conciliorum – Brill
Published: Apr 28, 2020