Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Focal Liver Uptake on FDG PET/CT Without CT Correlate: Utility of MRI in the Evaluation of Patients With Known Malignancy.

Focal Liver Uptake on FDG PET/CT Without CT Correlate: Utility of MRI in the Evaluation of... OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the significance and utility of MRI in evaluation of focal hepatic uptake on FDG PET/CT without a CT correlate in patients with known malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this retrospective study, we identified 36 of 1851 patients between 2005 and 2012 with known malignancy (19 women, 17 men; mean age, 56.1 years old) who had focal hepatic uptake on FDG PET/CT without a CT correlate and follow-up MRI within 100 days for assessment of uptake. Two radiologists reviewed the FDG PET/CT images together, reached consensus about presence of focal hepatic uptake, and measured maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the focal uptake and background liver. MR images were then reviewed to identify any correlate. Follow-up imaging and histopathologic data were reviewed to confirm or refute metastasis. Statistical correlation between intensity of FDG uptake and presence of focal lesions on MRI was performed. RESULTS. Fifty sites of focal hepatic uptake without CT correlate were identified. The median SUVmax was 4.1 (range, 2.1-10.1), whereas the ratio of median SUVmax of the hepatic lesion to that of normal parenchyma was 1.3 (range, 0.98-2.6). MRI confirmed focal lesions in 26 of 50 sites (52%). Seventy-seven percent of cases of hepatic uptake with an MRI correlate (20/26) were confirmed as metastatic disease (six cases at histopathology). Therefore, 40% of cases of hepatic uptake without a CT correlate (20/50) were metastases. We found no statistically significant difference in the SUVmax of hepatic lesions and SUVmax ratio between the groups with and without an MRI correlate (median SUVmax = 3.85 vs 4.2, p = 0.5; SUVmax ratio = 1.32 vs 1.31, p = 0.97) as well as between the groups with the final diagnosis of benign lesions and metastasis (SUVmax = 4.05 vs 3.95, p = 0.64; SUVmax ratio = 1.31 vs 1.32, p = 0.91). CONCLUSION. More than half of the cases of focal hepatic uptake on PET/CT without a CT correlate had an MRI correlate in our study, and more than 75% of these lesions were metastases, regardless of SUVmax. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png AJR. American journal of roentgenology Pubmed

Focal Liver Uptake on FDG PET/CT Without CT Correlate: Utility of MRI in the Evaluation of Patients With Known Malignancy.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology , Volume 213 (1): 7 – Jan 27, 2021

Focal Liver Uptake on FDG PET/CT Without CT Correlate: Utility of MRI in the Evaluation of Patients With Known Malignancy.


Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the significance and utility of MRI in evaluation of focal hepatic uptake on FDG PET/CT without a CT correlate in patients with known malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this retrospective study, we identified 36 of 1851 patients between 2005 and 2012 with known malignancy (19 women, 17 men; mean age, 56.1 years old) who had focal hepatic uptake on FDG PET/CT without a CT correlate and follow-up MRI within 100 days for assessment of uptake. Two radiologists reviewed the FDG PET/CT images together, reached consensus about presence of focal hepatic uptake, and measured maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the focal uptake and background liver. MR images were then reviewed to identify any correlate. Follow-up imaging and histopathologic data were reviewed to confirm or refute metastasis. Statistical correlation between intensity of FDG uptake and presence of focal lesions on MRI was performed. RESULTS. Fifty sites of focal hepatic uptake without CT correlate were identified. The median SUVmax was 4.1 (range, 2.1-10.1), whereas the ratio of median SUVmax of the hepatic lesion to that of normal parenchyma was 1.3 (range, 0.98-2.6). MRI confirmed focal lesions in 26 of 50 sites (52%). Seventy-seven percent of cases of hepatic uptake with an MRI correlate (20/26) were confirmed as metastatic disease (six cases at histopathology). Therefore, 40% of cases of hepatic uptake without a CT correlate (20/50) were metastases. We found no statistically significant difference in the SUVmax of hepatic lesions and SUVmax ratio between the groups with and without an MRI correlate (median SUVmax = 3.85 vs 4.2, p = 0.5; SUVmax ratio = 1.32 vs 1.31, p = 0.97) as well as between the groups with the final diagnosis of benign lesions and metastasis (SUVmax = 4.05 vs 3.95, p = 0.64; SUVmax ratio = 1.31 vs 1.32, p = 0.91). CONCLUSION. More than half of the cases of focal hepatic uptake on PET/CT without a CT correlate had an MRI correlate in our study, and more than 75% of these lesions were metastases, regardless of SUVmax.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/pubmed/focal-liver-uptake-on-fdg-pet-ct-without-ct-correlate-utility-of-mri-MK7AqDxsTC

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

ISSN
0361-803X
eISSN
1546-3141
DOI
10.2214/AJR.18.21035
pmid
30995099

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the significance and utility of MRI in evaluation of focal hepatic uptake on FDG PET/CT without a CT correlate in patients with known malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this retrospective study, we identified 36 of 1851 patients between 2005 and 2012 with known malignancy (19 women, 17 men; mean age, 56.1 years old) who had focal hepatic uptake on FDG PET/CT without a CT correlate and follow-up MRI within 100 days for assessment of uptake. Two radiologists reviewed the FDG PET/CT images together, reached consensus about presence of focal hepatic uptake, and measured maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the focal uptake and background liver. MR images were then reviewed to identify any correlate. Follow-up imaging and histopathologic data were reviewed to confirm or refute metastasis. Statistical correlation between intensity of FDG uptake and presence of focal lesions on MRI was performed. RESULTS. Fifty sites of focal hepatic uptake without CT correlate were identified. The median SUVmax was 4.1 (range, 2.1-10.1), whereas the ratio of median SUVmax of the hepatic lesion to that of normal parenchyma was 1.3 (range, 0.98-2.6). MRI confirmed focal lesions in 26 of 50 sites (52%). Seventy-seven percent of cases of hepatic uptake with an MRI correlate (20/26) were confirmed as metastatic disease (six cases at histopathology). Therefore, 40% of cases of hepatic uptake without a CT correlate (20/50) were metastases. We found no statistically significant difference in the SUVmax of hepatic lesions and SUVmax ratio between the groups with and without an MRI correlate (median SUVmax = 3.85 vs 4.2, p = 0.5; SUVmax ratio = 1.32 vs 1.31, p = 0.97) as well as between the groups with the final diagnosis of benign lesions and metastasis (SUVmax = 4.05 vs 3.95, p = 0.64; SUVmax ratio = 1.31 vs 1.32, p = 0.91). CONCLUSION. More than half of the cases of focal hepatic uptake on PET/CT without a CT correlate had an MRI correlate in our study, and more than 75% of these lesions were metastases, regardless of SUVmax.

Journal

AJR. American journal of roentgenologyPubmed

Published: Jan 27, 2021

There are no references for this article.