Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Speech Acts or Fluid Language

Speech Acts or Fluid Language Speech Acts or Fluid Language David H. Hirsch From time to time, philosophers have been good enough to shed the light of their wisdom on literary texts and on the process of literary criticism. I shall be so bold, in this essay, äs to turn the tables by trying my hand at analyzing a philosophical text. This boldness I shall justify on two grounds. The first is that the text in question centers on problems of language, the element that is the sine qua non of literature and literary criticism äs well äs philosophy. The second ground on which I justify my temerity is the belief that literary fictions, which are the critic's normal diet, share with philosophical treatises the tendency to make hypothetical Statements about "reality" and about language itself. Hence, it may be possible to approach certain philosophical texts in the same way that one would approach "literary fictions". As a literary critic, I will tend to concentrate on metaphorical language, analogies, and, on occasion, narrative technique. My ultimate purpose will not be frivolous. By explicating certain passages in John Searle's Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language1 I hope to be able to http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Literary Semantics de Gruyter

Speech Acts or Fluid Language

Journal of Literary Semantics , Volume 5 (1) – Jan 1, 1976

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/speech-acts-or-fluid-language-9gFXXa04cv

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the
ISSN
0341-7638
eISSN
1613-3838
DOI
10.1515/jlse.1976.5.1.15
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Speech Acts or Fluid Language David H. Hirsch From time to time, philosophers have been good enough to shed the light of their wisdom on literary texts and on the process of literary criticism. I shall be so bold, in this essay, äs to turn the tables by trying my hand at analyzing a philosophical text. This boldness I shall justify on two grounds. The first is that the text in question centers on problems of language, the element that is the sine qua non of literature and literary criticism äs well äs philosophy. The second ground on which I justify my temerity is the belief that literary fictions, which are the critic's normal diet, share with philosophical treatises the tendency to make hypothetical Statements about "reality" and about language itself. Hence, it may be possible to approach certain philosophical texts in the same way that one would approach "literary fictions". As a literary critic, I will tend to concentrate on metaphorical language, analogies, and, on occasion, narrative technique. My ultimate purpose will not be frivolous. By explicating certain passages in John Searle's Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language1 I hope to be able to

Journal

Journal of Literary Semanticsde Gruyter

Published: Jan 1, 1976

There are no references for this article.