Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer

Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer Brain metastasis is a major distant metastasis occurring in patients with advanced breast OPENACCESS cancer, and is associated with poor prognosis. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have a strong influ- Citation: Sato J, Shimomura A, Kawauchi J, ence on various oncological functions and have been reported as potential biomarkers for Matsuzaki J, Yamamoto Y, Takizawa S, et al. detecting distant metastasis. Specific biomarkers and unique miRNAs for brain metastasis (2019) Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in have yet to be reported. The aim of this study was to identify novel miRNAs in serum, to patients with advanced breast cancer. PLoS ONE 14(10): e0221538. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. assist in the diagnosis of brain metastasis in patients with advanced breast cancer. We ret- pone.0221538 rospectively analyzed the medical records of patients with breast cancer and collected clini- Editor: Harriet Wikman, Universitatsklinikum cal data. In addition, we evaluated serum miRNA profiles in patients with breast cancer, with Hamburg-Eppendorf, GERMANY and without brain metastasis, using high-sensitivity microarrays. All patients underwent Received: May 9, 2019 computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging brain imaging tests. A total of 51 serum samples from patients with breast cancer and brain metastasis, stored in the National Accepted: August 8, 2019 Cancer Center Biobank, were used, and 28 serum samples were obtained from controls Published: October 11, 2019 without brain metastasis. Two miRNAs, miR-4428 and miR-4480, could significantly distin- Copyright:© 2019 Sato et al. This is an open guish patients with brain metastasis, with area under the receiver operating characteristic access article distributed under the terms of the curve (AUC) values of 0.779 and 0.781, respectively, while a combination of miR-4428 and Creative Commons Attribution License, which progesterone receptor had an AUC value of 0.884. No significant correlations were identi- permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original fied between the expression levels of these two miRNAs in serum and clinical data. We con- author and source are credited. clude that serum miR-4428 and miR-4480 may be useful as biomarkers for predicting brain Data Availability Statement: The microRNA data metastasis in patients with breast cancer. underlying this study have been deposited to the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE134108. Funding: This study was financially supported through a “Development of Diagnostic Technology for Detection of miRNA in Body Fluids” grant from Introduction the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of death and the most common malignancy among Development. JS, MO, JM, TO, HS, KT received no women in developed countries. Up to 30% of patients with advanced breast cancer develop specific funding for this work. AS reports personal fees from Chugai Pharmatheutical, personal fees brain metastasis (BM), a type of distant metastasis associated with poor prognosis [1,2]. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 1 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer from Novartis Pharmatheutical, personal fees from Recent advances in the development of drug therapies have improved the prognosis for Pfizer, personal fees from Nippon Kayaku, personal patients with advanced breast cancer. However, those with BM still have poor outcomes. Previ- fees and other from AstraZeneca, personal fees ous studies have reported a median survival time for patients with breast cancer with BM, who from Eisai, outside the submitted work. YN reports received standard treatments for BM, of 6–15 months from BM detection [2,3]. The median grants and personal fees from Chugai survival time for patients with BM who received only steroids was approximately 2 months Pharmaceutical co., grants and personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical co., grants and personal fees [4], while the introduction of radiation therapy for BM improved survival to approximately from Abbvie, grants and personal fees from 6–7 months [5]. Further, chemotherapy is effective, to some extent, for patients with breast Dainippon-Sumitomo, grants and personal fees cancer and BM. Bachelot et al. reported that the overall survival among patients with advanced from Daiichi-Sankyo, grants and personal fees breast cancer with BM treated with platinum-based chemotherapy was 17.0 months (3.2–24.9 from Eisai, grants and personal fees from Stella- months) [6]. These previous reports suggest that an intensive treatment strategy, including pharma, grants and personal fees from Ohtuka, radiation and chemotherapy, is critically important for patients with BM. In addition, Lin et al. grants and personal fees from Meiji-seika, grants and personal fees from SBI pharma, outside the indicated that poor performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; ECOG) at the submitted work. ST reports personal fees from time of BM diagnosis was significantly associated with inferior outcomes following chemo- Toray Industries, Inc., during the conduct of the therapy [7]; however, it is not uncommon for patients with BM not to receive radiation or che- study; personal fees from Toray Industries, Inc., motherapy for BM, because of the devastating effects on the general health status of the patient outside the submitted work. JK reports and Entity: caused by BM. Considering the cost and time required to perform imaging tests, simplified Toray Industries, Inc.; personal Fees: employment. YY reports personal fees from Arkray, PNDeNA, detection of BM would provide clinical benefits for prevention and treatment. Kewpie, outside the submitted work. Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small non-coding RNAs in serum/plasma that are 21–25 nucleotides long and can strongly influence various oncological functions, Competing interests: JK and ST are employees of Toray Industries, Inc., the provider of the 3D- including both tumor suppression and cancer development [8]. Many circulating miRNAs Gene® system. YA is an employee of Dynacom have been reported as potential biomarkers for evaluation of breast cancer characteristics, Co., Ltd., the developer of the statistical script used including detection of the primary site in early stage disease or distant metastasis [9,10,11– for selecting the best miRNA combination. All other 18,19] [20–22]. authors have no conflict of interest to declare. This In the context of distant metastasis, expression of several specific miRNAs in breast cancer does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies specimens or cell lines is associated with metastatic localization [23,24]. The analysis of tissue on sharing data and materials. samples from patients with breast cancer and BM revealed that levels of miR509, miR20b, miR181-c, and miR130b-3p were significantly correlated with BM [25–28]. Moreover, there is evidence that some of these miRNAs have roles in the mechanisms underlying BM; however, specific biomarkers and miRNAs unique to BM have yet to be reported. Circulating miRNAs are detectable in serum samples and are potentially practical biomark- ers [29], and have been proposed as promising biomarkers in patients with advanced breast cancer [21]. The aim of this study was to identify novel miRNAs in serum useful for diagnos- ing BM in patients with advanced breast cancer using a circulating miRNA array-based approach. Materials and methods Clinical samples The medical records of patients with advanced breast cancer who were admitted or referred to the National Cancer Center Hospital (NCCH), Japan, between 2009 and 2016, were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with advanced breast cancer with the following characteristics were included: (1) pathologically diagnosed with breast cancer; (2) brain imaging test, including enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) con- ducted, regardless of the neurological symptoms; (3) treatment for breast cancer was per- formed in the NCCH; (4) serum samples were obtained within 1 month around the time when the imaging test was performed; and (5) patients with BM had not received any treatment (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or surgery) before collection of serum samples. Serum sam- ples from patients with breast cancer who provided consent for inclusion in the Biobank were stored at -20˚C in the NCCH. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 2 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer Clinical data, including sex, age, histology, hormone status, and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2, at the time of serum sample collection were investigated. Hormone status, estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PgR) were scored from 0 to 3 (0, no tumor cells stained; 1, < 1% stained; 2, > 1� 10% stained; 3,� 10% tumor cells stained) by immunohistochemistry. In the present study, hormone status positivity was defined as a score of 3. Positivity for HER-2 was defined as follows: immunohistochemistry, 3+ (uniform intense membrane staining of > 30% of invasive tumor cells); fluorescence in situ hybridization, amplified ratio of HER-2 to CEP17 of > 2.2; or average HER-2 gene copy number, > 6 sig- nals/nucleus for those test systems without an internal probe control, according to the Ameri- can Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guideline 2007 [30]. Microarray analysis of miRNA expression Total miRNA was extracted from 300 μl aliquots of serum samples using the 3D-Gene RNA extraction reagent from a liquid sample kit (Toray Industries, Inc., Kanagawa, Japan). Compre- hensive miRNA expression analysis was performed using a 3D-Gene microRNA Labeling kit and a 3D-Gene Human microRNA Oligo Chip (Toray Industries, Inc.), designed to detect 2540 miRNA sequences registered in miRBase releases 20 and 21 (http://www.mirbase.org/). MiRNA was defined as present if the corresponding microarray signal was more than the signal (mean + 2 × standard deviations) of the negative controls, of which the top and bottom 5%, ranked by signal intensity, were considered noise generated by the experimental system and were removed. When the signal value was negative, or undetected, after background subtrac- tion, the value was replaced by 0.1 on a base 2 logarithm scale. Three pre-selected internal con- trol miRNAs (miR-149-3p, miR-2861, and miR-4463) were used to normalize signals across the different microarrays tested. The results were subjected to probability analysis using receiver operating characteristic curves. All microarray data of this study are in agreement with the Min- imum Information About a Microarray Experiment (MIAME) guidelines and are publicly available through the GEO database (GSE134108, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/geo/). Statistical analysis Samples were divided into two groups: those from patients with BM and controls (without BM). MiRNAs were compared between the two clinical groups using a two-sided Student’s t- test with Bonferroni correction. P-values < 0.01 were considered statistically significant. To identify robust biomarkers, only miRNAs that had a signal value of 2 in more than 50% of analyses for each clinical group were selected for further analysis. MiRNAs associated with BM were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analysis models, by adjusting for possible risk factors for BM (age, hormone status, HER-2 status, resection surgery of primary site, and distant metastatic lesions). Variables included in the models were based on existing knowledge of breast cancer characteristics. Multicollinear anal- ysis and determination of a linear model with univariable analysis (Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient) were performed. This was followed by assessment of the fit of the model and its performance characteristics. To evaluate the predictive performance of the model, a Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 19 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Ethical statement The present study was approved by the NCCH Institutional Review Board. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 3 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer Results Characteristics of patients and samples A total of 51 serum samples from patients with breast cancer and BM stored in the National Cancer Center Biobank, and 28 serum samples from patients with breast cancer without BM (controls), were included in the study. The consort diagram for the present study is presented in Fig 1. Patients who were registered with the present study had advanced (Stage 4) clinical stage disease or recurrent status after surgical resection. There were no male patients. The characteristics of the patients with breast cancer with or without BM are presented in Table 1. BM was confirmed by enhanced CT scan, simple MRI, or enhanced MRI. At the time of diag- nosis of BM, none of the patients had received treatment for BM. Comparison of patients with and without BM To identify promising miRNA biomarkers, we excluded miRNAs with low signal intensity (< 2 ) from the miRNA microarray data (Fig 2). Next, we conducted two-sided Student’s t- tests, with Bonferroni correction, to compare data from patients with and without BM; the results from 436 detected miRNAs are plotted as a volcano plot (Fig 3). According to our selec- tion criteria (> 0.5 |fold-change| and p < 0.01), two miRNAs, miR-4428 and miR-4480, were selected as candidate biomarkers for diagnosis of BM in patients with breast cancer (Fig 2). Fig 1. Consort diagram of the present study. CT/MRI, computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging; BM, brain metastasis. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538.g001 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 4 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer Table 1. Characteristics of patients with breast cancer, with or without brain metastasis. With BM Without BM P Total number of patients 51 28 Age (years), median (range) 55 (27–82) 49 (35–85) 0.294 Pathology 0.383 IDC 39 24 ILC 2 0 Apocrine 1 0 Mucinous 1 0 Others 7 4 NA 1 0 Hormone-sensitive status PgR 0.001 Positive 11 17 Negative 37 11 NA 3 0 ER 0.005 Positive 15 18 Negative 33 10 NA 3 0 Ki-67 (%); median (range) 41.8 (11–84) 43.3 (6–92) 0.024 HER-2 status (IHC) 0.092 Positive 15 4 Negative 32 24 NA 4 0 Number of brain metastases NA Single 17 Multiple (≧2) 34 Mean size (max) of brain metastases (mm) 30.0 NA Primary tumor (not resected) 12 10 0.253 Distant metastases Lung 26 8 0.055 Liver 15 15 0.035 Lymph node 26 18 0.260 Bone 17 15 0.082 Skin/soft tissue 5 4 0.555 Pleural 2 4 0.099 BM, brain metastasis; ER, estrogen receptor; HER-2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IDC, invasive ductal carcinoma; ILC, invasive lobular carcinoma; IHC, immunohistochemistry; NA, not applicable; PgR, progesterone receptor. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538.t001 Receiver operating characteristic curves for the test cohort are presented in Fig 4. Area under the curve (AUC) values for miR-4428 and miR-4480 were 0.779 and 0.781, respectively, while a combination of miR-4428 and PgR had an AUC of 0.884. Specificity and AUC values were calculated for the discrimination of patients with BM from non-BM controls. miR-4428 and miR-4480 showed sensitivity of 82.4% and 76.5% and specificity of 64.3% and 71.4%, respectively. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 5 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer Fig 2. Flow diagram for detection of microRNAs. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538.g002 Multivariable analysis for candidate miRNAs To further investigate the two identified miRNAs (miR-4428 and miR-4480) as potential bio- markers for BM, we performed multivariable logistic regression model analysis. First, we esti- mated the linearity of each dependent variable, using Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient. No strong linearity was identified among these variables. Multiple logistic regres- sion analysis, adjusted for clinical characteristics and tumor properties, suggested a regression model including miR-4480 and PgR (Table 2). Pearson’s chi-square test for multivariable models indicated statistical significance (p < 0.001), as did tests for each dependent variable (p < 0.001). In addition, analysis using the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic suggested borderline significance (p = 0.143). The predictive value of the model was 84.6%, and no predicted value exceeded ± 3 standard deviations of the measured value. These results suggested that miR- 4480 is a strong candidate biomarker for prediction of BM and that PgR status may influence the expression of miR-4480 and BM. Discussion This is the first report to reveal the prognostic function of serum miRNAs for brain metastases in breast cancer patients. Several miRNAs are specifically expressed in breast cancer BM PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 6 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer Fig 3. Volcano plots of microRNAs. FC, fold-change. Vertical dashed line shows the border of >0.5 |foled change| Horizontal dashed line shows the border of >0.01 p- value. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538.g003 tissues; however, there are no reports of detection of BM-associated miRNAs in serum sam- ples, with the exception of miR-4428 and miR-4480, reported in this study. Recently, a number of new cancer-related miRNAs have been identified, the majority of which have never been examined for their applicability to detection of BM in patients with breast cancer. Wolf et al. measured the expression levels of miRNAs by qRT-PCR in BM sam- ples from patients originally diagnosed with unknown primary carcinoma, and reported that specific miRNAs of primary tumor origin were expressed in metastatic samples [31]. More- over, a number of miRNAs have been indicated to have functions in patients with various types of cancer [32,33]. No functional association of miR-4428 and miR-4480 with clinical data has previously been reported in patients with breast cancer and distant metastasis. One report suggested an association between miR-4480 and the pathogenesis of age-related macu- lar degeneration; however, the underlying mechanism remains unknown [34]. There is a lack of reports suggesting roles for, or detailing distribution of, miR-4428. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 7 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer Fig 4. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis of the diagnostic index using miR-4428, miR-4480, and a combination of miR-4428 and progesterone receptor (PgR). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538.g004 MiRNAs have many important functions in both the promotion and suppression of cancer pathogenesis [8]. Although the mechanisms underlying their involvement in distant metasta- sis, including BM, have yet to be defined, some miRNAs have been associated with specific functions in breast cancer. According to a study of breast cancer cell lines, miR-7 expression is involved in the migration and invasion of tumor cells, through regulation of the expression of the KLF4 gene[23]. Associations of miRNAs with BM and destruction of the blood brain bar- rier (BBB) have been demonstrated in more than one report. MiR-181c was found to lead abnormal distribution of actin, thereby inducing functional changes in the BBB, associated with cancer-derived extracellular vesicles in cell lines derived from breast cancer BM [27]. In a different pathway, miR-1258 suppresses breast cancer metastasis to the brain, and alterations PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 8 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer Table 2. Results of multivariable analysis. Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis Odds ratio (95% CI) P Odds ratio (95% CI) P Age 1.009 (0.971–1.048) 0.654 ER 0.253 (0.094–0.676) 0.006 PgR 0.192 (0.070–0.530) 0.001 0.111 (0.020–0.623) 0.013 HER-2 2.812 (0.828–9.558) 0.098 Ki-67 (%) 0.981 (0.961–1.001) 0.062 Primary site (not resected) 0.554 (0.202–1.518) 0.251 Distant metastases Lung 2.600 (0.969–6.974) 0.058 Liver 0.361 (0.139–0.940) 0.037 Lymph node 0.578 (0.224–1.491) 0.257 Bone 0.433 (0.169–1.113) 0.082 Skin/soft tissue 0.652 (0.160–2.656) 0.551 Pleural 0.245 (0.042–1.432) 0.118 miR-4428 2.847 (1.660–4.883) < 0.001 2.752 (1.249–5.300) 0.010 miR-4480 1.888 (1.344–2.652) < 0.001 CI, confidence interval; ER, estrogen receptor; HER-2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; NA, not applicable; PgR, progesterone receptor. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538.t002 in this miRNA were indicated to influence the mechanism of BM and BBB function [24,35]. The roles of the miRNAs identified in the present study in the mechanisms underlying BM remain unclear, and further functional analyses are required to address this question. Several specific miRNAs expressed in distant metastasis have been reported in breast cancer cells. A previous report showed that miR-106b-5p is expressed in pulmonary metastasis tissue samples and may be a predictive marker for lung metastasis [22]. Further, the combination of upregulation of miR-30b and downregulation of miR-125b is associated with lymph node metastasis [36]. Similarly, there is evidence that miR-135 and miR-203 can impact tumor growth in the bone microenvironment, through influencing RUNX2 protein levels [37,38]. MiR-218 effects the mechanism underlying bone metastasis through activation of the WNT signaling pathway in breast cancer [39]. While conducting multivariable analysis in the present study, we did not detect any relationship between miR-4428 (which was associated with BM) and other distant sites. In the few studies that have investigated the role of serum miRNAs in the mechanism of invasion and metastasis, distant lesions were investigated. Several miRNAs useful for detecting early stage breast cancer were not identified in this study [21,40]. According to a study conducted by Silvia et.al., miR-484 is a potential biomarker for early stage breast cancer; although this study reported novel findings, based on analysis of serum miRNAs, the small number of samples (39 patients with breast cancer and 10 healthy volunteers) was a limitation of the investigation. Shimomura et al. reported that a combination of five miRNAs (miR-1246, miR-1307-3p, miR-4634, miR-6861-5p, and miR-6875-5p) has a sensitivity of 97.3% and specificity of 82.9% for detecting early stage breast cancer by compar- ing 1280 samples from patients with breast cancer, 2836 from non-cancer controls, 451 from other types of cancer, and 63 from non-breast benign diseases [21]. As it is difficult to obtain samples from intracranial tumors in a general clinical setting, and as early detection of BM influences the accessibility to less-invasive radiation treatment, a stereotactic radiosurgery etc., investigation of miR-4428 and miR-4480 as specific serum biomarkers for BM in patients with PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 9 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer breast cancer is potentially valuable for earlier diagnosis and accurate monitoring for prevent- ing deterioration of general condition. In the current study, univariable analysis, in the course of multivariable analysis, suggested that ER, PgR, and the presence of liver metastasis may be inversely related to BM. Few studies have indicated significant relationships between hormone status and BM [41]. According to one report, among 14,599 breast cancer patients with BM, the ER positive rate was 37% (41% negative and the others unknown), the PgR positive rate was 36% (34% negative), the HER-2 positive rate was 35% (41% negative), and the triple negative rate was 27% (18% triple positive) [2]. MiR-106b was correlated with poor prognosis in triple negative breast cancer [42]. Based on the results of these studies, the association among BM, hormone status, and miRNAs remains unclear. The present study has certain limitations, including the small sample size in each group and the fact that tissue sample analyses were not conducted. In the clinical setting, brain imaging tests are not performed routinely, due to the low frequency of BM, which (along with the diffi- culty in obtaining samples from brain tumor tissue) may explain the small sample size. In addi- tion, these factors make it difficult to investigate the origin of serum miRNAs. It will be necessary to evaluate the expression levels of miRNAs compared with those in primary tumor tissue, metastatic site tissue, and serum. A further, prospective investigation, including func- tional analysis, should be conducted. Conclusion This is the first study to report the serum microRNAs as possible biomarker of BM in breast cancer. Serum miR-4480 and PgR negative are useful biomarkers for predicting BM in patients with breast cancer. Serum miR-4428 could be a biomarker and further investigation might be warranted. Acknowledgments The authors thank Tomomi Fukuda, Takumi Sonoda, Hiroko Tadokoro, Megumi Miyagi, and Tatsuya Suzuki for performing the microarray assays; Makiko Ichikawa and Satoshi Kondou for technical support; Noriko Abe for the management of serum samples; Michiko Ohori for the management of personal information; and Kazuki Sudo for independent confirmation of participant eligibility. Serum samples used in this study were obtained from the National Can- cer Center Biobank, which is supported by the National Cancer Center Research and Develop- ment Fund (29-A-1). This study was financially supported through a “Development of Diagnostic Technology for Detection of miRNA in Body Fluids” grant from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (to TORAY). Author Contributions Writing – original draft: Jun Sato. Writing – review & editing: Akihiko Shimomura, Junpei Kawauchi, Juntaro Matsuzaki, Yusuke Yamamoto, Satoko Takizawa, Hiromi Sakamoto, Makoto Ohno, Yoshitaka Narita, Takahiro Ochiya, Kenji Tamura. References 1. Kennecke H, Yerushalmi R, Woods R, Cheang MCU, Voduc D, Speers CH, et al. Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 3271–3277. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25. 9820 PMID: 20498394 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 10 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer 2. Rostami R, Mittal S, Rostami P, Tavassoli F, Jabbari B. Brain metastasis in breast cancer: a compre- hensive literature review. J Neurooncol. 2016; 127: 407–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016- 2075-3 PMID: 26909695 3. Bondy ML, Hortobagyi GN, Rivera E, Mirza NQ, Broglio K, Altundag K, et al. Clinicopathologic charac- teristics and prognostic factors in 420 metastatic breast cancer patients with central nervous system metastasis. Cancer. 2007; 110: 2640–2647. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23088 PMID: 17960791 4. Weissman DE. Glucocorticoid treatment for brain metastases and epidural spinal cord compression: A review. J Clin Oncol. 1988; 6: 543–551. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1988.6.3.543 PMID: 3280744 5. Shioura H, Toyoda T, Oya N, Kenjyo M, Hayakawa K, Inomata T, et al. Stereotactic Radiosurgery Plus Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy vs Stereotactic Radiosurgery Alone for Treatment of Brain Metastases. Jama. 2006; 295: 2483. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.21.2483 PMID: 16757720 6. Bachelot T, Romieu G, Campone M, Die ´ ras V, Cropet C, Dalenc F, et al. Lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients with previously untreated brain metastases from HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (LANDSCAPE): A single-group phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14: 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S1470-2045(12)70432-1 PMID: 23122784 7. Winer EP, Roychowdhury D, Wardley A, Oliva C, Greil R, Yardley D, et al. Multicenter Phase II Study of Lapatinib in Patients with Brain Metastases from HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15: 1452–1459. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1080 PMID: 19228746 8. Zhang B, Pan X, Cobb GP AT. MicroRNAs as Oncogenes and Tumor Suppressors. Dev Biol. 2007; 302: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.028 PMID: 16989803 9. Zhu W, Qin W, Atasoy U, Sauter ER. Circulating microRNAs in breast cancer and healthy subjects. BMC Res Notes. 2009; 2: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-1 10. Kerin MJ, Miller N, Kelly R, Newell J, Heneghan HM. Systemic miRNA-195 Differentiates Breast Cancer from Other Malignancies and Is a Potential Biomarker for Detecting Noninvasive and Early Stage Dis- ease. Oncologist. 2010; 15: 673–682. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0103 PMID: 11. Asaga S, Kuo C, Nguyen T, Terpenning M, Giuliano AE HD. Direct Serum Assay for MicroRNA-21 Con- centrations in Early and Advanced Breast Cancer. Clin Chem. 2011; 57: 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1373/ clinchem.2010.151845 PMID: 21036945 12. Roth C, Rack B, Mu ¨ ller V, Janni W, Pantel K SH. Circulating microRNAs as blood-based markers for patients with primary and metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2010; 12: 6–13. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/bcr2766 PMID: 21047409 13. Jung EJ, Santarpia L, Kim J, Esteva FJ, Moretti E, Buzdar AU, Di Leo A, Le XF, Bast RC Jr, Park ST, Pusztai L CG. Plasma microRNA 210 levels correlate with sensitivity to trastuzumab and tumor pres- ence in breast cancer patients. Cancer. 2012; 118: 2603–2614. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26565 PMID: 22370716 14. Si H, Sun X, Chen Y, Cao Y, Chen S, Wang H HC. Circulating microRNA-92a and microRNA-21 as novel minimally invasive biomarkers for primary breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013; 139: 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-012-1315-y PMID: 23052693 15. Sun Y, Wang M, Lin G, Sun S, Li X, Qi J, et al. Serum MicroRNA-155 as a Potential Biomarker to Track Disease in Breast Cancer. PLoS One. 2012; 7: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047003 PMID: 23071695 16. Chan M, Liaw CS, Ji SM, Tan HH, Wong CY, Thike AA, et al. Identification of circulating microRNA sig- natures for breast cancer detection. Clin Cancer Res. 2013; 19: 4477–4487. https://doi.org/10.1158/ 1078-0432.CCR-12-3401 PMID: 23797906 17. Cuk K, Zucknick M, Madhavan D, Schott S, Golatta M, Heil J, et al. Plasma MicroRNA Panel for Mini- mally Invasive Detection of Breast Cancer. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e76729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0076729 PMID: 24194846 18. Zearo S, Kim E, Zhu Y, Zhao JT, Sidhu SB, Robinson BG SPs. MicroRNA-484 is more highly expressed in serum of early breast cancer patients compared to healthy volunteers. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-1 19. Sochor M, Basova P, Pesta M, Dusilkova N, Bartos J, Burda P, et al. Oncogenic microRNAs: miR-155, miR-19a, miR-181b, and miR-24 enable monitoring of early breast cancer in serum. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14: 448. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-448 PMID: 24938880 20. Shen J, Hu Q, Schrauder M, Yan L, Wang D, Medico L, Guo Y, Yao S, Zhu Q, Liu B, Qin M, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA, Strick R, Johnson CS, Ambrosone CB, Zhao H LS. Circulating miR-148b and miR- 133a as biomarkers for breast cancer detection. Oncotarget. 2014; 5: 5284–94. https://doi.org/10. 18632/oncotarget.2014 PMID: 25051376 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 11 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer 21. Shimomura A, Shiino S, Kawauchi J, Takizawa S, Sakamoto H, Matsuzaki J, Ono M, Takeshita F, Niida S, Shimizu C, Fujiwara Y, Kinoshita T, Tamura K OT. Novel combination of serum microRNA for detect- ing breast cancer in the early stage. Cancer Sci. 2016; 107: 326–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas. 12880 PMID: 26749252 22. Schrijver WAME, van Diest PJ, Moelans CB. Unravelling site-specific breast cancer metastasis: A microRNA expression profiling study. Oncotarget. 2017; 8: 3111–3123. https://doi.org/10.18632/ oncotarget.13623 PMID: 27902972 23. Okuda H, Xing F, Pandey PR, Sharma S, Watabe M, Pai SK, Mo YY, Iiizumi-Gairani M, Hirota S, Liu Y, Wu K, Pochampally R WK. miR-7 Suppresses Brain Metastasis of Breast Cancer Stem-Like Cells By Modulating KLF4. Cancer Res. 2013; 73: 1434–1444. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2037 PMID: 23384942 24. Zhang L, Sullivan PS, Goodman JC, Gunaratne PH, Marchetti D. MicroRNA-1258 suppresses breast cancer brain metastasis by targeting heparanase. Cancer Res. 2011; 71: 645–654. https://doi.org/10. 1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1910 PMID: 21266359 25. Xing F, Sharma S, Liu Y, Mo YY, Wu K, Zhang YY, et al. MiR-509 suppresses brain metastasis of breast cancer cells by modulating RhoC and TNF-α. Oncogene. 2015; 34: 4890–4900. https://doi.org/10.1038/ onc.2014.412 PMID: 25659578 26. Ahmad A, Ginnebaugh KR, Sethi S, Chen W, Ali R, Mittal S, et al. miR-20b is up-regulated in brain metastases from primary breast cancers. Oncotarget. 2015; 6: 12188–12195. https://doi.org/10.18632/ oncotarget.3664 PMID: 25893380 27. Tominaga N, Kosaka N, Ono M, Katsuda T, Yoshioka Y, Tamura K, et al. Brain metastatic cancer cells release microRNA-181c-containing extracellular vesicles capable of destructing blood-brain barrier. Nat Commun. 2015; 6: 6716. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7716 PMID: 25828099 28. Shui Y, Yu X, Duan R, Bao Q, Wu J, Yuan H, et al. miR-130b-3p inhibits cell invasion and migration by targeting the Notch ligand Delta-like 1 in breast carcinoma. Gene. 2017; 609: 80–87. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.gene.2017.01.036 PMID: 28163094 29. Montano M. MicroRNAs: miRRORS of Health and Disease. Transl Res. 2011; 157: 157–162. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2011.02.001 PMID: 21420026 30. Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31: 3997–4013. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9984 PMID: 24101045 31. Spector Y, Chajut A, Rosenwald S, Aharonov R, Mueller WC, Jaeger D, et al. Accurate Classification of Metastatic Brain Tumors Using a Novel MicroRNA-Based Test. Oncologist. 2011; 16: 165–174. https:// doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0305 PMID: 21273512 32. McDermott R, Gabikian P, Sarvaiya P, Ulasov I, Lesniak MS. MicroRNAs in brain metastases: Big things come in small packages. J Mol Med. 2013; 91: 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-012-0971-3 PMID: 23138927 33. Alsidawi S, Malek E, Driscoll JJ. MicroRNAs in brain metastases: Potential role as diagnostics and ther- apeutics. Int J Mol Sci. 2014; 15: 10508–10526. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms150610508 PMID: 34. Popp NA, Yu D, Green B, Chew EY, Ning B, Chan CC TJ. Functional single nucleotide polymorphism in IL-17A 3’ untranslated region is targeted by miR-4480 in vitro and may be associated with age-related macular degeneration. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2016; 57: 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.21982 PMID: 26765636 35. Ridgway LD, Wetzel MD, Ngo JA, Erdreich-Epstein A, Marchetti D. Heparanase-Induced GEF-H1 Sig- naling Regulates the Cytoskeletal Dynamics of Brain Metastatic Breast Cancer Cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2012; 10: 689–702. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-11-0534 PMID: 22513363 36. Baffa R, Fassan M, Volinia S, O’Hara B, Liu CG, Palazzo JP, Gardiman M, Rugge M, Gomella LG, Croce CM RA. MicroRNA expression profiling of human metastatic cancers identifies cancer gene tar- gets. J Pathol. 2009; 219: 214–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.2586 PMID: 19593777 37. Haider MT, Taipaleenma ¨ ki H. Targeting the metastatic bone microenvironment by MicroRNAs. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018; 9: 202. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00202 PMID: 29780354 38. Taipaleenma ¨ ki H, Browne G, Akech J, Zustin J, Van Wijnen AJ, Stein JL, et al. Targeting of Runx2 by miR-135 and miR-203 impairs progression of breast cancer and metastatic bone disease. Cancer Res. 2015; 75: 1433–1444. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1026 PMID: 25634212 39. Hassan MQ, Maeda Y, Taipaleenmaki H, Zhang W, Jafferji M, Gordon JAR, et al. miR-218 directs a Wnt signaling circuit to promote differentiation of osteoblasts and osteomimicry of metastatic cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2012; 287: 42084–42092. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.377515 PMID: PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 12 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer 40. Zearo S, Kim E, Zhu Y, Zhao JT, Sidhu SB, Robinson BG, et al. MicroRNA-484 is more highly expressed in serum of early breast cancer patients compared to healthy volunteers. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-1 41. Custo ´ dio-Santos T, Videira M, Brito MA. Brain metastasization of breast cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta —Rev Cancer. 2017; 1868: 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.03.004 PMID: 28341420 42. Janssen EAM, Slewa A, Gudlaugsson E, Jonsdottir K, Skaland I, Søiland H, et al. Biologic profiling of lymph node negative breast cancers by means of microRNA expression. Mod Pathol. 2010; 23: 1567– 1576. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2010.177 PMID: 20818337 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 13 / 13 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png PLoS ONE Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journal

Loading next page...
 
/lp/public-library-of-science-plos-journal/brain-metastasis-related-micrornas-in-patients-with-advanced-breast-QDQ4Bx4yRS

References (93)

Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journal
Copyright
Copyright: © 2019 Sato et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Data Availability: The microRNA data underlying this study have been deposited to the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE134108. Funding: This study was financially supported through a “Development of Diagnostic Technology for Detection of miRNA in Body Fluids” grant from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development. JS, MO, JM, TO, HS, KT received no specific funding for this work. AS reports personal fees from Chugai Pharmatheutical, personal fees from Novartis Pharmatheutical, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Nippon Kayaku, personal fees and other from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Eisai, outside the submitted work. YN reports grants and personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical co., grants and personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical co., grants and personal fees from Abbvie, grants and personal fees from Dainippon-Sumitomo, grants and personal fees from Daiichi-Sankyo, grants and personal fees from Eisai, grants and personal fees from Stella-pharma, grants and personal fees from Ohtuka, grants and personal fees from Meiji-seika, grants and personal fees from SBI pharma, outside the submitted work. ST reports personal fees from Toray Industries, Inc., during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Toray Industries, Inc., outside the submitted work. JK reports and Entity: Toray Industries, Inc.; personal Fees: employment. YY reports personal fees from Arkray, PNDeNA, Kewpie, outside the submitted work. Competing interests: JK and ST are employees of Toray Industries, Inc., the provider of the 3D-Gene® system. YA is an employee of Dynacom Co., Ltd., the developer of the statistical script used for selecting the best miRNA combination. All other authors have no conflict of interest to declare. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
eISSN
1932-6203
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0221538
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Brain metastasis is a major distant metastasis occurring in patients with advanced breast OPENACCESS cancer, and is associated with poor prognosis. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have a strong influ- Citation: Sato J, Shimomura A, Kawauchi J, ence on various oncological functions and have been reported as potential biomarkers for Matsuzaki J, Yamamoto Y, Takizawa S, et al. detecting distant metastasis. Specific biomarkers and unique miRNAs for brain metastasis (2019) Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in have yet to be reported. The aim of this study was to identify novel miRNAs in serum, to patients with advanced breast cancer. PLoS ONE 14(10): e0221538. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. assist in the diagnosis of brain metastasis in patients with advanced breast cancer. We ret- pone.0221538 rospectively analyzed the medical records of patients with breast cancer and collected clini- Editor: Harriet Wikman, Universitatsklinikum cal data. In addition, we evaluated serum miRNA profiles in patients with breast cancer, with Hamburg-Eppendorf, GERMANY and without brain metastasis, using high-sensitivity microarrays. All patients underwent Received: May 9, 2019 computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging brain imaging tests. A total of 51 serum samples from patients with breast cancer and brain metastasis, stored in the National Accepted: August 8, 2019 Cancer Center Biobank, were used, and 28 serum samples were obtained from controls Published: October 11, 2019 without brain metastasis. Two miRNAs, miR-4428 and miR-4480, could significantly distin- Copyright:© 2019 Sato et al. This is an open guish patients with brain metastasis, with area under the receiver operating characteristic access article distributed under the terms of the curve (AUC) values of 0.779 and 0.781, respectively, while a combination of miR-4428 and Creative Commons Attribution License, which progesterone receptor had an AUC value of 0.884. No significant correlations were identi- permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original fied between the expression levels of these two miRNAs in serum and clinical data. We con- author and source are credited. clude that serum miR-4428 and miR-4480 may be useful as biomarkers for predicting brain Data Availability Statement: The microRNA data metastasis in patients with breast cancer. underlying this study have been deposited to the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE134108. Funding: This study was financially supported through a “Development of Diagnostic Technology for Detection of miRNA in Body Fluids” grant from Introduction the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of death and the most common malignancy among Development. JS, MO, JM, TO, HS, KT received no women in developed countries. Up to 30% of patients with advanced breast cancer develop specific funding for this work. AS reports personal fees from Chugai Pharmatheutical, personal fees brain metastasis (BM), a type of distant metastasis associated with poor prognosis [1,2]. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 1 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer from Novartis Pharmatheutical, personal fees from Recent advances in the development of drug therapies have improved the prognosis for Pfizer, personal fees from Nippon Kayaku, personal patients with advanced breast cancer. However, those with BM still have poor outcomes. Previ- fees and other from AstraZeneca, personal fees ous studies have reported a median survival time for patients with breast cancer with BM, who from Eisai, outside the submitted work. YN reports received standard treatments for BM, of 6–15 months from BM detection [2,3]. The median grants and personal fees from Chugai survival time for patients with BM who received only steroids was approximately 2 months Pharmaceutical co., grants and personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical co., grants and personal fees [4], while the introduction of radiation therapy for BM improved survival to approximately from Abbvie, grants and personal fees from 6–7 months [5]. Further, chemotherapy is effective, to some extent, for patients with breast Dainippon-Sumitomo, grants and personal fees cancer and BM. Bachelot et al. reported that the overall survival among patients with advanced from Daiichi-Sankyo, grants and personal fees breast cancer with BM treated with platinum-based chemotherapy was 17.0 months (3.2–24.9 from Eisai, grants and personal fees from Stella- months) [6]. These previous reports suggest that an intensive treatment strategy, including pharma, grants and personal fees from Ohtuka, radiation and chemotherapy, is critically important for patients with BM. In addition, Lin et al. grants and personal fees from Meiji-seika, grants and personal fees from SBI pharma, outside the indicated that poor performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; ECOG) at the submitted work. ST reports personal fees from time of BM diagnosis was significantly associated with inferior outcomes following chemo- Toray Industries, Inc., during the conduct of the therapy [7]; however, it is not uncommon for patients with BM not to receive radiation or che- study; personal fees from Toray Industries, Inc., motherapy for BM, because of the devastating effects on the general health status of the patient outside the submitted work. JK reports and Entity: caused by BM. Considering the cost and time required to perform imaging tests, simplified Toray Industries, Inc.; personal Fees: employment. YY reports personal fees from Arkray, PNDeNA, detection of BM would provide clinical benefits for prevention and treatment. Kewpie, outside the submitted work. Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small non-coding RNAs in serum/plasma that are 21–25 nucleotides long and can strongly influence various oncological functions, Competing interests: JK and ST are employees of Toray Industries, Inc., the provider of the 3D- including both tumor suppression and cancer development [8]. Many circulating miRNAs Gene® system. YA is an employee of Dynacom have been reported as potential biomarkers for evaluation of breast cancer characteristics, Co., Ltd., the developer of the statistical script used including detection of the primary site in early stage disease or distant metastasis [9,10,11– for selecting the best miRNA combination. All other 18,19] [20–22]. authors have no conflict of interest to declare. This In the context of distant metastasis, expression of several specific miRNAs in breast cancer does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies specimens or cell lines is associated with metastatic localization [23,24]. The analysis of tissue on sharing data and materials. samples from patients with breast cancer and BM revealed that levels of miR509, miR20b, miR181-c, and miR130b-3p were significantly correlated with BM [25–28]. Moreover, there is evidence that some of these miRNAs have roles in the mechanisms underlying BM; however, specific biomarkers and miRNAs unique to BM have yet to be reported. Circulating miRNAs are detectable in serum samples and are potentially practical biomark- ers [29], and have been proposed as promising biomarkers in patients with advanced breast cancer [21]. The aim of this study was to identify novel miRNAs in serum useful for diagnos- ing BM in patients with advanced breast cancer using a circulating miRNA array-based approach. Materials and methods Clinical samples The medical records of patients with advanced breast cancer who were admitted or referred to the National Cancer Center Hospital (NCCH), Japan, between 2009 and 2016, were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with advanced breast cancer with the following characteristics were included: (1) pathologically diagnosed with breast cancer; (2) brain imaging test, including enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) con- ducted, regardless of the neurological symptoms; (3) treatment for breast cancer was per- formed in the NCCH; (4) serum samples were obtained within 1 month around the time when the imaging test was performed; and (5) patients with BM had not received any treatment (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or surgery) before collection of serum samples. Serum sam- ples from patients with breast cancer who provided consent for inclusion in the Biobank were stored at -20˚C in the NCCH. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 2 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer Clinical data, including sex, age, histology, hormone status, and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2, at the time of serum sample collection were investigated. Hormone status, estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PgR) were scored from 0 to 3 (0, no tumor cells stained; 1, < 1% stained; 2, > 1� 10% stained; 3,� 10% tumor cells stained) by immunohistochemistry. In the present study, hormone status positivity was defined as a score of 3. Positivity for HER-2 was defined as follows: immunohistochemistry, 3+ (uniform intense membrane staining of > 30% of invasive tumor cells); fluorescence in situ hybridization, amplified ratio of HER-2 to CEP17 of > 2.2; or average HER-2 gene copy number, > 6 sig- nals/nucleus for those test systems without an internal probe control, according to the Ameri- can Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guideline 2007 [30]. Microarray analysis of miRNA expression Total miRNA was extracted from 300 μl aliquots of serum samples using the 3D-Gene RNA extraction reagent from a liquid sample kit (Toray Industries, Inc., Kanagawa, Japan). Compre- hensive miRNA expression analysis was performed using a 3D-Gene microRNA Labeling kit and a 3D-Gene Human microRNA Oligo Chip (Toray Industries, Inc.), designed to detect 2540 miRNA sequences registered in miRBase releases 20 and 21 (http://www.mirbase.org/). MiRNA was defined as present if the corresponding microarray signal was more than the signal (mean + 2 × standard deviations) of the negative controls, of which the top and bottom 5%, ranked by signal intensity, were considered noise generated by the experimental system and were removed. When the signal value was negative, or undetected, after background subtrac- tion, the value was replaced by 0.1 on a base 2 logarithm scale. Three pre-selected internal con- trol miRNAs (miR-149-3p, miR-2861, and miR-4463) were used to normalize signals across the different microarrays tested. The results were subjected to probability analysis using receiver operating characteristic curves. All microarray data of this study are in agreement with the Min- imum Information About a Microarray Experiment (MIAME) guidelines and are publicly available through the GEO database (GSE134108, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/geo/). Statistical analysis Samples were divided into two groups: those from patients with BM and controls (without BM). MiRNAs were compared between the two clinical groups using a two-sided Student’s t- test with Bonferroni correction. P-values < 0.01 were considered statistically significant. To identify robust biomarkers, only miRNAs that had a signal value of 2 in more than 50% of analyses for each clinical group were selected for further analysis. MiRNAs associated with BM were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analysis models, by adjusting for possible risk factors for BM (age, hormone status, HER-2 status, resection surgery of primary site, and distant metastatic lesions). Variables included in the models were based on existing knowledge of breast cancer characteristics. Multicollinear anal- ysis and determination of a linear model with univariable analysis (Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient) were performed. This was followed by assessment of the fit of the model and its performance characteristics. To evaluate the predictive performance of the model, a Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 19 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Ethical statement The present study was approved by the NCCH Institutional Review Board. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 3 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer Results Characteristics of patients and samples A total of 51 serum samples from patients with breast cancer and BM stored in the National Cancer Center Biobank, and 28 serum samples from patients with breast cancer without BM (controls), were included in the study. The consort diagram for the present study is presented in Fig 1. Patients who were registered with the present study had advanced (Stage 4) clinical stage disease or recurrent status after surgical resection. There were no male patients. The characteristics of the patients with breast cancer with or without BM are presented in Table 1. BM was confirmed by enhanced CT scan, simple MRI, or enhanced MRI. At the time of diag- nosis of BM, none of the patients had received treatment for BM. Comparison of patients with and without BM To identify promising miRNA biomarkers, we excluded miRNAs with low signal intensity (< 2 ) from the miRNA microarray data (Fig 2). Next, we conducted two-sided Student’s t- tests, with Bonferroni correction, to compare data from patients with and without BM; the results from 436 detected miRNAs are plotted as a volcano plot (Fig 3). According to our selec- tion criteria (> 0.5 |fold-change| and p < 0.01), two miRNAs, miR-4428 and miR-4480, were selected as candidate biomarkers for diagnosis of BM in patients with breast cancer (Fig 2). Fig 1. Consort diagram of the present study. CT/MRI, computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging; BM, brain metastasis. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538.g001 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 4 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer Table 1. Characteristics of patients with breast cancer, with or without brain metastasis. With BM Without BM P Total number of patients 51 28 Age (years), median (range) 55 (27–82) 49 (35–85) 0.294 Pathology 0.383 IDC 39 24 ILC 2 0 Apocrine 1 0 Mucinous 1 0 Others 7 4 NA 1 0 Hormone-sensitive status PgR 0.001 Positive 11 17 Negative 37 11 NA 3 0 ER 0.005 Positive 15 18 Negative 33 10 NA 3 0 Ki-67 (%); median (range) 41.8 (11–84) 43.3 (6–92) 0.024 HER-2 status (IHC) 0.092 Positive 15 4 Negative 32 24 NA 4 0 Number of brain metastases NA Single 17 Multiple (≧2) 34 Mean size (max) of brain metastases (mm) 30.0 NA Primary tumor (not resected) 12 10 0.253 Distant metastases Lung 26 8 0.055 Liver 15 15 0.035 Lymph node 26 18 0.260 Bone 17 15 0.082 Skin/soft tissue 5 4 0.555 Pleural 2 4 0.099 BM, brain metastasis; ER, estrogen receptor; HER-2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IDC, invasive ductal carcinoma; ILC, invasive lobular carcinoma; IHC, immunohistochemistry; NA, not applicable; PgR, progesterone receptor. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538.t001 Receiver operating characteristic curves for the test cohort are presented in Fig 4. Area under the curve (AUC) values for miR-4428 and miR-4480 were 0.779 and 0.781, respectively, while a combination of miR-4428 and PgR had an AUC of 0.884. Specificity and AUC values were calculated for the discrimination of patients with BM from non-BM controls. miR-4428 and miR-4480 showed sensitivity of 82.4% and 76.5% and specificity of 64.3% and 71.4%, respectively. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 5 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer Fig 2. Flow diagram for detection of microRNAs. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538.g002 Multivariable analysis for candidate miRNAs To further investigate the two identified miRNAs (miR-4428 and miR-4480) as potential bio- markers for BM, we performed multivariable logistic regression model analysis. First, we esti- mated the linearity of each dependent variable, using Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient. No strong linearity was identified among these variables. Multiple logistic regres- sion analysis, adjusted for clinical characteristics and tumor properties, suggested a regression model including miR-4480 and PgR (Table 2). Pearson’s chi-square test for multivariable models indicated statistical significance (p < 0.001), as did tests for each dependent variable (p < 0.001). In addition, analysis using the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic suggested borderline significance (p = 0.143). The predictive value of the model was 84.6%, and no predicted value exceeded ± 3 standard deviations of the measured value. These results suggested that miR- 4480 is a strong candidate biomarker for prediction of BM and that PgR status may influence the expression of miR-4480 and BM. Discussion This is the first report to reveal the prognostic function of serum miRNAs for brain metastases in breast cancer patients. Several miRNAs are specifically expressed in breast cancer BM PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 6 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer Fig 3. Volcano plots of microRNAs. FC, fold-change. Vertical dashed line shows the border of >0.5 |foled change| Horizontal dashed line shows the border of >0.01 p- value. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538.g003 tissues; however, there are no reports of detection of BM-associated miRNAs in serum sam- ples, with the exception of miR-4428 and miR-4480, reported in this study. Recently, a number of new cancer-related miRNAs have been identified, the majority of which have never been examined for their applicability to detection of BM in patients with breast cancer. Wolf et al. measured the expression levels of miRNAs by qRT-PCR in BM sam- ples from patients originally diagnosed with unknown primary carcinoma, and reported that specific miRNAs of primary tumor origin were expressed in metastatic samples [31]. More- over, a number of miRNAs have been indicated to have functions in patients with various types of cancer [32,33]. No functional association of miR-4428 and miR-4480 with clinical data has previously been reported in patients with breast cancer and distant metastasis. One report suggested an association between miR-4480 and the pathogenesis of age-related macu- lar degeneration; however, the underlying mechanism remains unknown [34]. There is a lack of reports suggesting roles for, or detailing distribution of, miR-4428. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 7 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer Fig 4. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis of the diagnostic index using miR-4428, miR-4480, and a combination of miR-4428 and progesterone receptor (PgR). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538.g004 MiRNAs have many important functions in both the promotion and suppression of cancer pathogenesis [8]. Although the mechanisms underlying their involvement in distant metasta- sis, including BM, have yet to be defined, some miRNAs have been associated with specific functions in breast cancer. According to a study of breast cancer cell lines, miR-7 expression is involved in the migration and invasion of tumor cells, through regulation of the expression of the KLF4 gene[23]. Associations of miRNAs with BM and destruction of the blood brain bar- rier (BBB) have been demonstrated in more than one report. MiR-181c was found to lead abnormal distribution of actin, thereby inducing functional changes in the BBB, associated with cancer-derived extracellular vesicles in cell lines derived from breast cancer BM [27]. In a different pathway, miR-1258 suppresses breast cancer metastasis to the brain, and alterations PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 8 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer Table 2. Results of multivariable analysis. Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis Odds ratio (95% CI) P Odds ratio (95% CI) P Age 1.009 (0.971–1.048) 0.654 ER 0.253 (0.094–0.676) 0.006 PgR 0.192 (0.070–0.530) 0.001 0.111 (0.020–0.623) 0.013 HER-2 2.812 (0.828–9.558) 0.098 Ki-67 (%) 0.981 (0.961–1.001) 0.062 Primary site (not resected) 0.554 (0.202–1.518) 0.251 Distant metastases Lung 2.600 (0.969–6.974) 0.058 Liver 0.361 (0.139–0.940) 0.037 Lymph node 0.578 (0.224–1.491) 0.257 Bone 0.433 (0.169–1.113) 0.082 Skin/soft tissue 0.652 (0.160–2.656) 0.551 Pleural 0.245 (0.042–1.432) 0.118 miR-4428 2.847 (1.660–4.883) < 0.001 2.752 (1.249–5.300) 0.010 miR-4480 1.888 (1.344–2.652) < 0.001 CI, confidence interval; ER, estrogen receptor; HER-2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; NA, not applicable; PgR, progesterone receptor. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538.t002 in this miRNA were indicated to influence the mechanism of BM and BBB function [24,35]. The roles of the miRNAs identified in the present study in the mechanisms underlying BM remain unclear, and further functional analyses are required to address this question. Several specific miRNAs expressed in distant metastasis have been reported in breast cancer cells. A previous report showed that miR-106b-5p is expressed in pulmonary metastasis tissue samples and may be a predictive marker for lung metastasis [22]. Further, the combination of upregulation of miR-30b and downregulation of miR-125b is associated with lymph node metastasis [36]. Similarly, there is evidence that miR-135 and miR-203 can impact tumor growth in the bone microenvironment, through influencing RUNX2 protein levels [37,38]. MiR-218 effects the mechanism underlying bone metastasis through activation of the WNT signaling pathway in breast cancer [39]. While conducting multivariable analysis in the present study, we did not detect any relationship between miR-4428 (which was associated with BM) and other distant sites. In the few studies that have investigated the role of serum miRNAs in the mechanism of invasion and metastasis, distant lesions were investigated. Several miRNAs useful for detecting early stage breast cancer were not identified in this study [21,40]. According to a study conducted by Silvia et.al., miR-484 is a potential biomarker for early stage breast cancer; although this study reported novel findings, based on analysis of serum miRNAs, the small number of samples (39 patients with breast cancer and 10 healthy volunteers) was a limitation of the investigation. Shimomura et al. reported that a combination of five miRNAs (miR-1246, miR-1307-3p, miR-4634, miR-6861-5p, and miR-6875-5p) has a sensitivity of 97.3% and specificity of 82.9% for detecting early stage breast cancer by compar- ing 1280 samples from patients with breast cancer, 2836 from non-cancer controls, 451 from other types of cancer, and 63 from non-breast benign diseases [21]. As it is difficult to obtain samples from intracranial tumors in a general clinical setting, and as early detection of BM influences the accessibility to less-invasive radiation treatment, a stereotactic radiosurgery etc., investigation of miR-4428 and miR-4480 as specific serum biomarkers for BM in patients with PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 9 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer breast cancer is potentially valuable for earlier diagnosis and accurate monitoring for prevent- ing deterioration of general condition. In the current study, univariable analysis, in the course of multivariable analysis, suggested that ER, PgR, and the presence of liver metastasis may be inversely related to BM. Few studies have indicated significant relationships between hormone status and BM [41]. According to one report, among 14,599 breast cancer patients with BM, the ER positive rate was 37% (41% negative and the others unknown), the PgR positive rate was 36% (34% negative), the HER-2 positive rate was 35% (41% negative), and the triple negative rate was 27% (18% triple positive) [2]. MiR-106b was correlated with poor prognosis in triple negative breast cancer [42]. Based on the results of these studies, the association among BM, hormone status, and miRNAs remains unclear. The present study has certain limitations, including the small sample size in each group and the fact that tissue sample analyses were not conducted. In the clinical setting, brain imaging tests are not performed routinely, due to the low frequency of BM, which (along with the diffi- culty in obtaining samples from brain tumor tissue) may explain the small sample size. In addi- tion, these factors make it difficult to investigate the origin of serum miRNAs. It will be necessary to evaluate the expression levels of miRNAs compared with those in primary tumor tissue, metastatic site tissue, and serum. A further, prospective investigation, including func- tional analysis, should be conducted. Conclusion This is the first study to report the serum microRNAs as possible biomarker of BM in breast cancer. Serum miR-4480 and PgR negative are useful biomarkers for predicting BM in patients with breast cancer. Serum miR-4428 could be a biomarker and further investigation might be warranted. Acknowledgments The authors thank Tomomi Fukuda, Takumi Sonoda, Hiroko Tadokoro, Megumi Miyagi, and Tatsuya Suzuki for performing the microarray assays; Makiko Ichikawa and Satoshi Kondou for technical support; Noriko Abe for the management of serum samples; Michiko Ohori for the management of personal information; and Kazuki Sudo for independent confirmation of participant eligibility. Serum samples used in this study were obtained from the National Can- cer Center Biobank, which is supported by the National Cancer Center Research and Develop- ment Fund (29-A-1). This study was financially supported through a “Development of Diagnostic Technology for Detection of miRNA in Body Fluids” grant from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (to TORAY). Author Contributions Writing – original draft: Jun Sato. Writing – review & editing: Akihiko Shimomura, Junpei Kawauchi, Juntaro Matsuzaki, Yusuke Yamamoto, Satoko Takizawa, Hiromi Sakamoto, Makoto Ohno, Yoshitaka Narita, Takahiro Ochiya, Kenji Tamura. References 1. Kennecke H, Yerushalmi R, Woods R, Cheang MCU, Voduc D, Speers CH, et al. Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 3271–3277. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25. 9820 PMID: 20498394 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 10 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer 2. Rostami R, Mittal S, Rostami P, Tavassoli F, Jabbari B. Brain metastasis in breast cancer: a compre- hensive literature review. J Neurooncol. 2016; 127: 407–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016- 2075-3 PMID: 26909695 3. Bondy ML, Hortobagyi GN, Rivera E, Mirza NQ, Broglio K, Altundag K, et al. Clinicopathologic charac- teristics and prognostic factors in 420 metastatic breast cancer patients with central nervous system metastasis. Cancer. 2007; 110: 2640–2647. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23088 PMID: 17960791 4. Weissman DE. Glucocorticoid treatment for brain metastases and epidural spinal cord compression: A review. J Clin Oncol. 1988; 6: 543–551. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1988.6.3.543 PMID: 3280744 5. Shioura H, Toyoda T, Oya N, Kenjyo M, Hayakawa K, Inomata T, et al. Stereotactic Radiosurgery Plus Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy vs Stereotactic Radiosurgery Alone for Treatment of Brain Metastases. Jama. 2006; 295: 2483. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.21.2483 PMID: 16757720 6. Bachelot T, Romieu G, Campone M, Die ´ ras V, Cropet C, Dalenc F, et al. Lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients with previously untreated brain metastases from HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (LANDSCAPE): A single-group phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14: 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S1470-2045(12)70432-1 PMID: 23122784 7. Winer EP, Roychowdhury D, Wardley A, Oliva C, Greil R, Yardley D, et al. Multicenter Phase II Study of Lapatinib in Patients with Brain Metastases from HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15: 1452–1459. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1080 PMID: 19228746 8. Zhang B, Pan X, Cobb GP AT. MicroRNAs as Oncogenes and Tumor Suppressors. Dev Biol. 2007; 302: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.028 PMID: 16989803 9. Zhu W, Qin W, Atasoy U, Sauter ER. Circulating microRNAs in breast cancer and healthy subjects. BMC Res Notes. 2009; 2: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-1 10. Kerin MJ, Miller N, Kelly R, Newell J, Heneghan HM. Systemic miRNA-195 Differentiates Breast Cancer from Other Malignancies and Is a Potential Biomarker for Detecting Noninvasive and Early Stage Dis- ease. Oncologist. 2010; 15: 673–682. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0103 PMID: 11. Asaga S, Kuo C, Nguyen T, Terpenning M, Giuliano AE HD. Direct Serum Assay for MicroRNA-21 Con- centrations in Early and Advanced Breast Cancer. Clin Chem. 2011; 57: 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1373/ clinchem.2010.151845 PMID: 21036945 12. Roth C, Rack B, Mu ¨ ller V, Janni W, Pantel K SH. Circulating microRNAs as blood-based markers for patients with primary and metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2010; 12: 6–13. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/bcr2766 PMID: 21047409 13. Jung EJ, Santarpia L, Kim J, Esteva FJ, Moretti E, Buzdar AU, Di Leo A, Le XF, Bast RC Jr, Park ST, Pusztai L CG. Plasma microRNA 210 levels correlate with sensitivity to trastuzumab and tumor pres- ence in breast cancer patients. Cancer. 2012; 118: 2603–2614. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26565 PMID: 22370716 14. Si H, Sun X, Chen Y, Cao Y, Chen S, Wang H HC. Circulating microRNA-92a and microRNA-21 as novel minimally invasive biomarkers for primary breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013; 139: 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-012-1315-y PMID: 23052693 15. Sun Y, Wang M, Lin G, Sun S, Li X, Qi J, et al. Serum MicroRNA-155 as a Potential Biomarker to Track Disease in Breast Cancer. PLoS One. 2012; 7: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047003 PMID: 23071695 16. Chan M, Liaw CS, Ji SM, Tan HH, Wong CY, Thike AA, et al. Identification of circulating microRNA sig- natures for breast cancer detection. Clin Cancer Res. 2013; 19: 4477–4487. https://doi.org/10.1158/ 1078-0432.CCR-12-3401 PMID: 23797906 17. Cuk K, Zucknick M, Madhavan D, Schott S, Golatta M, Heil J, et al. Plasma MicroRNA Panel for Mini- mally Invasive Detection of Breast Cancer. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e76729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0076729 PMID: 24194846 18. Zearo S, Kim E, Zhu Y, Zhao JT, Sidhu SB, Robinson BG SPs. MicroRNA-484 is more highly expressed in serum of early breast cancer patients compared to healthy volunteers. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-1 19. Sochor M, Basova P, Pesta M, Dusilkova N, Bartos J, Burda P, et al. Oncogenic microRNAs: miR-155, miR-19a, miR-181b, and miR-24 enable monitoring of early breast cancer in serum. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14: 448. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-448 PMID: 24938880 20. Shen J, Hu Q, Schrauder M, Yan L, Wang D, Medico L, Guo Y, Yao S, Zhu Q, Liu B, Qin M, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA, Strick R, Johnson CS, Ambrosone CB, Zhao H LS. Circulating miR-148b and miR- 133a as biomarkers for breast cancer detection. Oncotarget. 2014; 5: 5284–94. https://doi.org/10. 18632/oncotarget.2014 PMID: 25051376 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 11 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer 21. Shimomura A, Shiino S, Kawauchi J, Takizawa S, Sakamoto H, Matsuzaki J, Ono M, Takeshita F, Niida S, Shimizu C, Fujiwara Y, Kinoshita T, Tamura K OT. Novel combination of serum microRNA for detect- ing breast cancer in the early stage. Cancer Sci. 2016; 107: 326–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas. 12880 PMID: 26749252 22. Schrijver WAME, van Diest PJ, Moelans CB. Unravelling site-specific breast cancer metastasis: A microRNA expression profiling study. Oncotarget. 2017; 8: 3111–3123. https://doi.org/10.18632/ oncotarget.13623 PMID: 27902972 23. Okuda H, Xing F, Pandey PR, Sharma S, Watabe M, Pai SK, Mo YY, Iiizumi-Gairani M, Hirota S, Liu Y, Wu K, Pochampally R WK. miR-7 Suppresses Brain Metastasis of Breast Cancer Stem-Like Cells By Modulating KLF4. Cancer Res. 2013; 73: 1434–1444. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2037 PMID: 23384942 24. Zhang L, Sullivan PS, Goodman JC, Gunaratne PH, Marchetti D. MicroRNA-1258 suppresses breast cancer brain metastasis by targeting heparanase. Cancer Res. 2011; 71: 645–654. https://doi.org/10. 1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1910 PMID: 21266359 25. Xing F, Sharma S, Liu Y, Mo YY, Wu K, Zhang YY, et al. MiR-509 suppresses brain metastasis of breast cancer cells by modulating RhoC and TNF-α. Oncogene. 2015; 34: 4890–4900. https://doi.org/10.1038/ onc.2014.412 PMID: 25659578 26. Ahmad A, Ginnebaugh KR, Sethi S, Chen W, Ali R, Mittal S, et al. miR-20b is up-regulated in brain metastases from primary breast cancers. Oncotarget. 2015; 6: 12188–12195. https://doi.org/10.18632/ oncotarget.3664 PMID: 25893380 27. Tominaga N, Kosaka N, Ono M, Katsuda T, Yoshioka Y, Tamura K, et al. Brain metastatic cancer cells release microRNA-181c-containing extracellular vesicles capable of destructing blood-brain barrier. Nat Commun. 2015; 6: 6716. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7716 PMID: 25828099 28. Shui Y, Yu X, Duan R, Bao Q, Wu J, Yuan H, et al. miR-130b-3p inhibits cell invasion and migration by targeting the Notch ligand Delta-like 1 in breast carcinoma. Gene. 2017; 609: 80–87. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.gene.2017.01.036 PMID: 28163094 29. Montano M. MicroRNAs: miRRORS of Health and Disease. Transl Res. 2011; 157: 157–162. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2011.02.001 PMID: 21420026 30. Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31: 3997–4013. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9984 PMID: 24101045 31. Spector Y, Chajut A, Rosenwald S, Aharonov R, Mueller WC, Jaeger D, et al. Accurate Classification of Metastatic Brain Tumors Using a Novel MicroRNA-Based Test. Oncologist. 2011; 16: 165–174. https:// doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0305 PMID: 21273512 32. McDermott R, Gabikian P, Sarvaiya P, Ulasov I, Lesniak MS. MicroRNAs in brain metastases: Big things come in small packages. J Mol Med. 2013; 91: 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-012-0971-3 PMID: 23138927 33. Alsidawi S, Malek E, Driscoll JJ. MicroRNAs in brain metastases: Potential role as diagnostics and ther- apeutics. Int J Mol Sci. 2014; 15: 10508–10526. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms150610508 PMID: 34. Popp NA, Yu D, Green B, Chew EY, Ning B, Chan CC TJ. Functional single nucleotide polymorphism in IL-17A 3’ untranslated region is targeted by miR-4480 in vitro and may be associated with age-related macular degeneration. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2016; 57: 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.21982 PMID: 26765636 35. Ridgway LD, Wetzel MD, Ngo JA, Erdreich-Epstein A, Marchetti D. Heparanase-Induced GEF-H1 Sig- naling Regulates the Cytoskeletal Dynamics of Brain Metastatic Breast Cancer Cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2012; 10: 689–702. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-11-0534 PMID: 22513363 36. Baffa R, Fassan M, Volinia S, O’Hara B, Liu CG, Palazzo JP, Gardiman M, Rugge M, Gomella LG, Croce CM RA. MicroRNA expression profiling of human metastatic cancers identifies cancer gene tar- gets. J Pathol. 2009; 219: 214–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.2586 PMID: 19593777 37. Haider MT, Taipaleenma ¨ ki H. Targeting the metastatic bone microenvironment by MicroRNAs. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018; 9: 202. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00202 PMID: 29780354 38. Taipaleenma ¨ ki H, Browne G, Akech J, Zustin J, Van Wijnen AJ, Stein JL, et al. Targeting of Runx2 by miR-135 and miR-203 impairs progression of breast cancer and metastatic bone disease. Cancer Res. 2015; 75: 1433–1444. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1026 PMID: 25634212 39. Hassan MQ, Maeda Y, Taipaleenmaki H, Zhang W, Jafferji M, Gordon JAR, et al. miR-218 directs a Wnt signaling circuit to promote differentiation of osteoblasts and osteomimicry of metastatic cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2012; 287: 42084–42092. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.377515 PMID: PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 12 / 13 Brain metastasis-related microRNAs in patients with advanced breast cancer 40. Zearo S, Kim E, Zhu Y, Zhao JT, Sidhu SB, Robinson BG, et al. MicroRNA-484 is more highly expressed in serum of early breast cancer patients compared to healthy volunteers. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-1 41. Custo ´ dio-Santos T, Videira M, Brito MA. Brain metastasization of breast cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta —Rev Cancer. 2017; 1868: 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.03.004 PMID: 28341420 42. Janssen EAM, Slewa A, Gudlaugsson E, Jonsdottir K, Skaland I, Søiland H, et al. Biologic profiling of lymph node negative breast cancers by means of microRNA expression. Mod Pathol. 2010; 23: 1567– 1576. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2010.177 PMID: 20818337 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221538 October 11, 2019 13 / 13

Journal

PLoS ONEPublic Library of Science (PLoS) Journal

Published: Oct 11, 2019

There are no references for this article.