Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Holland (1980)
An Analytic Model of the Wind and Pressure Profiles in HurricanesMonthly Weather Review, 108
(1983)
Aerological Data of Japan, 30-year Period Averages (1951-1980), Part 2
R. Schloemer (1954)
Analysis and synthesis of hurricane wind patterns over Lake Okeechobee, Florida., 31
R. Anthes (1982)
Tropical Cyclones: Their Evolution, Structure and Effects
(1974)
An objective analysis on surface pressure field in typhoon region ( in Japanese )
H. Matano (1956)
On the Role of the Lateral Mixing in the Cyclostrophic Flow Pattern in the AtmosphereJournal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 34
R. Flather (1994)
A storm surge prediction model for the northern Bay of Bengal with application to the cyclone disaster in April 1991Journal of Physical Oceanography, 24
G. Hubbert, G. Holland, L. Leslie, M. Manton (1991)
A Real-Time System for Forecasting Tropical Cyclone Storm SurgesWeather and Forecasting, 6
(1995)
On the radial pressure profiles of typhoons
R. Tuleya, M. Bender, Y. Kurihara (1984)
A Simulation Study of the Landfall of Tropical CyclonesMonthly Weather Review, 112
Y. Mitsuta, T. Fujii, K. Kawahira (1979)
ANALYSIS OF TYPHOON PRESSURE PATTERNS OVER JAPANESE ISLANDS (II), 1
Characteristics of 51 severe typhoons hitting the Japanese main islands with central pressure equal to or less than 980 hPa during the period 1955–94 were analyzed by an objective method using hourly station observation during typhoon passages. Position of a typhoon center, central pressure depth Δ p , and radius of the maximum wind r m , were obtained at hourly intervals after landfall on the main islands of Japan. The pressure profile of severe typhoons used in this analysis was chosen from formulas presented in previous papers, namely the same as one used by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for hurricanes hitting Florida. Coastlines of the main islands were divided into three sections: areas A, B, and C extending from west to east. Statistical analyses of parameters were made for each area. At time of landfall, the maximum value of Δ p was 83.2 hPa for area A, 85.2 hPa for area B, and 47.8 hPa for area C. The differences in return period of Δ p among areas are considered to be caused by the SST distribution off the Pacific coast. On average, typhoons making landfall in area C have larger r m and speed, and display a more eastward component of translation than those in the other two areas. The differences of speed and direction among areas and months can be explained to be caused by variation of the synoptic-scale air current at the 500-hPa level.
Monthly Weather Review – American Meteorological Society
Published: May 5, 1997
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.