Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Chlond (1994)
Locally Modified Version of Bott's Advection SchemeMonthly Weather Review, 122
P. Colella, P. Woodward (1984)
The Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) for Gas Dynamical SimulationsJournal of Computational Physics, 54
Ionel Navon (1981)
Implementation of APosterioriMethods for Enforcing Conservation of Potential Enstrophy and Mass in Discretized Shallow-Water Equations ModelsMonthly Weather Review, 109
T. Krishnamurti (1962)
Numerical Integration of Primitive Equations by a Quasi-Lagrangian Advective SchemeJournal of Applied Meteorology, 1
A. Priestley (1993)
A Quasi-Conservative Version of the Semi-Lagrangian Advection SchemeMonthly Weather Review, 121
P. Smolarkiewicz, T. Clark (1986)
The multidimensional positive definite advection transport algorithm: further development and applicationsJournal of Computational Physics, 67
R. Bermejo, A. Staniforth (1992)
The Conversion of Semi-Lagrangian Advection Schemes to Quasi-Monotone SchemesMonthly Weather Review, 120
J. Pudykiewicz, A. Staniforth (1984)
Some properties and comparative performance of the semi‐Lagrangian method of Robert in the solution of the advection‐diffusion equationAtmosphere-ocean, 22
S. Gravel, A. Staniforth (1992)
Variable Resolution and RobustnessMonthly Weather Review, 120
K. Emde (1992)
Solving conservation laws with parabolic and cubic splinesMonthly Weather Review, 120
R. Easter (1993)
Two Modified Versions of Bott's Positive-Definite Numerical Advection SchemeMonthly Weather Review, 121
W. Crowley (1968)
NUMERICAL ADVECTION EXPERIMENTS1Monthly Weather Review, 96
Ching-Yuang Huang, S. Raman (1991)
A comparative study of numerical advection schemes featuring a one-step modified WKL algorithmMonthly Weather Review, 119
R. Bermejo (1990)
On the Equivalence of Semi-Lagrangian Schemes and Particle-in-Cell Finite Element MethodsMonthly Weather Review, 118
S. Zalesak (1979)
Fully multidimensional flux-corrected transport algorithms for fluidsJournal of Computational Physics, 31
P. Rasch, D. Williamson (1990)
On Shape-Preserving Interpolation and Semi-Lagrangian TransportSIAM J. Sci. Comput., 11
Bkam Leer, B. Leer (1979)
Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's methodJournal of Computational Physics, 32
J. McGregor (1993)
Economical Determination of Departure Points for Semi-Lagrangian ModelsMonthly Weather Review, 121
C. Tremback, J. Powell, W. Cotton, R. Pielke (1987)
The forward-in-time upstream advection scheme:extension to higher ordersMonthly Weather Review, 115
P. Long, D. Pepper (1981)
An Examination of Some Simple Numerical Schemes for Calculating Scalar AdvectionJournal of Applied Meteorology, 20
Ching-Yuang Huang (1993)
A Study of High-Order Advection Schemes in Variable ResolutionTerrestrial Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 4
D. Williamson, P. Rasch (1989)
Two-dimensional semi-Lagrangian trans-port with shape-preserving interpolation
D. Purnell (1976)
Solution of the Advective Equation by Upstream Interpolation with a Cubic SplineMonthly Weather Review, 104
A. Bott (1989)
A positive definite advection scheme obtained by nonlinear renormalization of the advective fluxesMonthly Weather Review, 117
Shian‐Jiann Lin, W. Chao, Y. Sud, G. Walker (1994)
A Class of the van Leer-type Transport Schemes and Its Application to the Moisture Transport in a General Circulation ModelMonthly Weather Review, 122
P. Makar, S. Karpik (1996)
Basis-Spline Interpolation on the Sphere: Applications to Semi-Lagrangian AdvectionMonthly Weather Review, 124
P. Smolarkiewicz, P. Rasch (1991)
Monotone Advection on the Sphere: An Eulerian Versus Semi-Lagrangian ApproachJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 48
Quasi-conservative high-order semi-Lagrangian advection schemes are compared with several positive-definite Eulerian schemes in flux form, including Bott’’s scheme. In this study, the conventional equipartition method is modified as a posterior iterative mass correction algorithm to restore conservation for semi-Lagrangian transport. The performance comparisons between semi-Lagrangian and Eulerian schemes are evidence that the fifth-order (seventh-order) Bott’’s area-preserving algorithm without flux limitation is practically equivalent to the quintic (seventh-order) semi-Lagrangian scheme in the rotational flow, with the maximum directional Courant number smaller than 0.5. For positive-definite advection, Bott’’s algorithm with the flux limitation obtains slightly better (worse) amplitude preservation in the rotational flow tests compared to semi-Lagrangian schemes of same order with (without) the mass correction algorithm. In the nonlinear deformational flow where the maximum directional Courant number is greater than 0.5, the former is slightly unstable and only the short-term results are acceptable, but the latter at the long-term remains stable, conservative, and reasonable. Monotonic tests of semi-Lagrangian schemes were also conducted. It was found that quasi-monotone schemes based on a posterior monotonicity constraint are not influenced by the mass correction algorithm. Both monotonicity and mass conservation can be achieved simultaneously for semi-Lagrangian transport by the post adjustments. However, the monotonicity constraint itself cannot fully suppress the numerical dispersion in the strong nonlinear deformational flow where the mass correction procedure appears to be significantly important for strict mass conservation and a reduction in phase errors.
Journal of Applied Meteorology – American Meteorological Society
Published: Apr 12, 1996
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.