Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

SLOVAK STUDIES: LITERATURE

SLOVAK STUDIES: LITERATURE Slovak Studies LITERATURE* By K. BRusAK, Visiting Lecturer in Czech and Slovak at the University of Cambridge (This survey covers the years 1981-84) I. GENERAL In the years covered by this survey considerable attention has been paid to theory of literature. Literary. semiotics are treated in N. Krausova, 'Semantika litenirneho textu', SLit, Ig82: 1 93-2 I 2, polemicizing with van Dijk and Greimas, and Id., Vjznam tvaru - tvar vjznamu, SlSp, 356 pp., discussing semiotic systems. A. Popovic, 'Komunikacny aspekt literarnej diachronie', SIPoh, I g8 I, no. I I : 8 I -g I, criticizes formalism and structuralism and endorses the historical method. Among many works dealing with the social function of literature and stressing the duty ofliterature to interpret the present and the future in the spirit of humanism and communism one can note I. Hrusovsky, Monol6gy a dia16gy, SlSp, Ig82, 180 pp.; F. Miko, Hodnoty a litmirny proces, Tatran, Ig82, 375 pp.; R. Lesnak, Literarne dielo a citatef, SlSp, Ig82, 272 pp.; P. Llba, Kontexty popularnej literatury, Tatran, Ig8I, 253 pp.; and A. Siracky, 'Medzi literaturou a filozofiou', SIPoh, I g8 I, no. 12: 3- 14. The function ofliterary criticism on the Marx-Leninist basis is defined in http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Year’s Work in Modern Language Studies Brill

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/slovak-studies-literature-kEQiWHSunk

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0084-4152
eISSN
2222-4297
DOI
10.1163/22224297-90002688
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Slovak Studies LITERATURE* By K. BRusAK, Visiting Lecturer in Czech and Slovak at the University of Cambridge (This survey covers the years 1981-84) I. GENERAL In the years covered by this survey considerable attention has been paid to theory of literature. Literary. semiotics are treated in N. Krausova, 'Semantika litenirneho textu', SLit, Ig82: 1 93-2 I 2, polemicizing with van Dijk and Greimas, and Id., Vjznam tvaru - tvar vjznamu, SlSp, 356 pp., discussing semiotic systems. A. Popovic, 'Komunikacny aspekt literarnej diachronie', SIPoh, I g8 I, no. I I : 8 I -g I, criticizes formalism and structuralism and endorses the historical method. Among many works dealing with the social function of literature and stressing the duty ofliterature to interpret the present and the future in the spirit of humanism and communism one can note I. Hrusovsky, Monol6gy a dia16gy, SlSp, Ig82, 180 pp.; F. Miko, Hodnoty a litmirny proces, Tatran, Ig82, 375 pp.; R. Lesnak, Literarne dielo a citatef, SlSp, Ig82, 272 pp.; P. Llba, Kontexty popularnej literatury, Tatran, Ig8I, 253 pp.; and A. Siracky, 'Medzi literaturou a filozofiou', SIPoh, I g8 I, no. 12: 3- 14. The function ofliterary criticism on the Marx-Leninist basis is defined in

Journal

The Year’s Work in Modern Language StudiesBrill

Published: Mar 13, 1985

There are no references for this article.