Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Greenberg’s connoisseurship in Mondrian’s space

Greenberg’s connoisseurship in Mondrian’s space In ‘Modernist Painting’ (1960), Clement Greenberg famously wrote that ‘flatness alone was unique and exclusive to pictorial art’. However, in a less cited passage, he admitted to exaggeration: there ‘can never be an absolute flatness’, and an artist like Mondrian pursued ‘a pictorial, strictly optical third dimension’, a perceived turn to opticality for which the critic was later faulted. Closer readings of drafts for this and other seminal texts such as ‘Towards a Newer Laocoon’ (1940) show that Greenberg was himself a close reader or connoisseur of the spatial and optical (i.e. ‘plastic’) modalities of Mondrian’s ‘Neo-Plasticism’. An underlying tension thus emerges between the familiar Greenberg as ideologue-theorist and a lesser-known Greenberg as connoisseur-critic. The former constructed powerful dogmas of modernism that constituted his primary, lasting influence, yet his greatest contribution may lie precisely in his close readings of specific artists, above all within the orbit of Mondrian’s space. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art / Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek Online Brill

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/greenberg-s-connoisseurship-in-mondrian-s-space-ZkOCld8xk3

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
eISSN
2214-5966
DOI
10.1163/22145966-06901011
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In ‘Modernist Painting’ (1960), Clement Greenberg famously wrote that ‘flatness alone was unique and exclusive to pictorial art’. However, in a less cited passage, he admitted to exaggeration: there ‘can never be an absolute flatness’, and an artist like Mondrian pursued ‘a pictorial, strictly optical third dimension’, a perceived turn to opticality for which the critic was later faulted. Closer readings of drafts for this and other seminal texts such as ‘Towards a Newer Laocoon’ (1940) show that Greenberg was himself a close reader or connoisseur of the spatial and optical (i.e. ‘plastic’) modalities of Mondrian’s ‘Neo-Plasticism’. An underlying tension thus emerges between the familiar Greenberg as ideologue-theorist and a lesser-known Greenberg as connoisseur-critic. The former constructed powerful dogmas of modernism that constituted his primary, lasting influence, yet his greatest contribution may lie precisely in his close readings of specific artists, above all within the orbit of Mondrian’s space.

Journal

Netherlands Yearbook for History of Art / Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek OnlineBrill

Published: May 20, 2020

There are no references for this article.