Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Sukhbinder Kumar, Helen Forster, P. Bailey, T. Griffiths (2008)
Mapping unpleasantness of sounds to their auditory representation.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124 6
M. Edelstein, D. Brang, R. Rouw, V. Ramachandran (2013)
Misophonia: physiological investigations and case descriptionsFrontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7
D. Alais, D. Burr (2004)
The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal IntegrationCurrent Biology, 14
G. Bruxner (2016)
‘Mastication rage’: a review of misophonia – an under-recognised symptom of psychiatric relevance?Australasian Psychiatry, 24
Sukhbinder Kumar, Katharina Kriegstein, Karl Friston, T. Griffiths (2012)
Features versus Feelings: Dissociable Representations of the Acoustic Features and Valence of Aversive SoundsThe Journal of Neuroscience, 32
T. Cox (2008)
The effect of visual stimuli on the horribleness of awful soundsApplied Acoustics, 69
Agnieszka McErlean, M. Banissy (2018)
Increased misophonia in self-reported Autonomous Sensory Meridian ResponsePeerJ, 6
T. Dozier (2015)
Counterconditioning Treatment for MisophoniaClinical Case Studies, 14
Emma Barratt, N. Davis (2015)
Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response (ASMR): a flow-like mental statePeerJ, 3
K. Munhall, P. Gribble, L. Sacco, Matthew Ward (1996)
Temporal constraints on the McGurk effectPerception & Psychophysics, 58
R. Rouw, M. Erfanian (2018)
A Large-Scale Study of Misophonia.Journal of clinical psychology, 74 3
A. Schröder, N. Vulink, Arnoud Loon, D. Denys (2017)
Cognitive behavioral therapy is effective in misophonia: An open trial.Journal of affective disorders, 217
H. McGurk, J. MacDonald (1976)
Hearing lips and seeing voicesNature, 264
A. Schröder, N. Vulink, D. Denys (2013)
Misophonia: Diagnostic Criteria for a New Psychiatric DisorderPLoS ONE, 8
Christoph Reuter, Michael Oehler (2011)
Psychoacoustics of chalkboard squeakingJournal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130
S. Shimojo, Ladan Shams (2001)
Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: plasticity and interactionsCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology, 11
Rosemary Bernstein, Karyn Angell, C. Dehle (2013)
A brief course of cognitive behavioural therapy for the treatment of misophonia: a case exampleThe Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 6
R. Sekuler, A. Sekuler, R. Lau (1997)
Sound alters visual motion perceptionNature, 385
P. Thibodeau (2016)
A Moist Crevice for Word Aversion: In Semantics Not SoundsPLoS ONE, 11
P. Jastreboff, Margaret Jastreboff (2014)
Treatments for Decreased Sound Tolerance (Hyperacusis and Misophonia)Seminars in Hearing, 35
M. Viinikainen, J. Kätsyri, Mikko Sams (2012)
Representation of perceived sound valence in the human brainHuman Brain Mapping, 33
D. Zald, J. Pardo (2002)
The Neural Correlates of Aversive Auditory StimulationNeuroImage, 16
(2014)
Youtube videos trigger tingling brain orgasms in ASMR practitioners Available fromhttp www nydailynews com
Amy Irwin, D. Hall, Andrew Peters, C. Plack (2011)
Listening to urban soundscapes: Physiological validity of perceptual dimensions.Psychophysiology, 48 2
Misophonia: a disorder of emotion processing of sounds
Margaret Jastreboff, P. Jastreboff (2002)
Decreased Sound Tolerance and Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT)Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology, 24
F. Mirz, A. Gjedde, Hans Sdkilde-Jrgensen, C. Pedersen (2000)
Functional brain imaging of tinnitus‐like perception induced by aversive auditory stimuliNeuroReport, 11
AbstractWe propose that cross-sensory stimuli presenting a positive attributable source of an aversive sound can modulate negative reactions to the sound. In Experiment 1, participants rated original video sources (OVS) of eight aversive sounds (e.g., nails scratching a chalkboard) as more aversive than eight positive attributable video sources (PAVS) of those same sounds (e.g., someone playing a flute) when these videos were presented silently. In Experiment 2, new participants were presented with those eight aversive sounds in three blocks. In Blocks 1 and 3, the sounds were presented alone; in Block 2, four of the sounds were randomly presented concurrently with their corresponding OVS videos, and the other four with their corresponding PAVS videos. Participants rated each sound, presented with or without video, on three scales: discomfort, unpleasantness, and bodily sensations. We found the concurrent presentation of videos robustly modulates participants’ reactions to the sounds: compared to the sounds alone (Block 1), concurrent presentation of PAVS videos significantly reduced negative reactions to the sounds, and the concurrent presentation of OVS videos significantly increased negative reactions, across all three scales. These effects, however, did not linger into Block 3 when the sounds were presented alone again. Our results provide novel evidence that negative reactions to aversive sounds can be modulated through cross-sensory temporal syncing with a positive attributable video source. Although this research was conducted with a neurotypical population, we argue that our findings have implications for the treatment of misophonia.
Multisensory Research (continuation of Seeing & Perceiving from 2013) – Brill
Published: Sep 5, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.