Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/brill/legal-status-of-taiping-island-under-the-united-nations-convention-on-hxAHosrkYk
References
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
- Publisher
- Brill
- Copyright
- © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
- ISSN
- 2213-4476
- eISSN
- 2213-4484
- DOI
- 10.1163/22134484-12340055
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
The government of the Philippines argues in the South China Sea arbitration case that all features in the Spratly archipelago are incapable of sustaining human habitation or economic life of their own. Even the largest feature in the Spratlys, that is, Taiping Island (Itu Aba), is a “rock” and accordingly, cannot generate maritime entitlement to a 200 nautical mile Exclusive Economic Zone ( eez ) under unclos . Is Taiping Island an “island” or a “rock” under the unclos ? Is Taiping Island capable of sustaining human habitation or economic life of its own? Is Taiping Island entitled to generate a 200-nm eez or a continental shelf? The purpose of this article is to answer these questions from the perspective of Taiwan. It is Taiwan’s position that Taiping Island is “a full-fledged island” and therefore can generate a 200-nm eez in accordance with Article 121 of unclos .
Journal
Korean Journal of International and Comparative Law – Brill
Published: Nov 13, 2015
Keywords: Taiping Island; Taiwan; Article 121; unclos ; arbitration; South China Sea