Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Lingyu Gan, Yingyu Huang, Liang Zhou, C. Qian, Xiang Wu (2015)
Synchronization to a bouncing ball with a realistic motion trajectoryScientific Reports, 5
J. McAuley, M. Jones (2003)
Modeling effects of rhythmic context on perceived duration: a comparison of interval and entrainment approaches to short-interval timing.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 29 6
(2008)
Moving on time: brain network
S. Silva, S. Castro (2016)
Moving Stimuli Facilitate Synchronization But Not Temporal PerceptionFrontiers in Psychology, 7
M. Hove, M. Fairhurst, S. Kotz, P. Keller (2013)
Synchronizing with auditory and visual rhythms: An fMRI assessment of modality differences and modality appropriatenessNeuroImage, 67
M. Hove, P. Keller (2010)
Spatiotemporal relations and movement trajectories in visuomotor synchronizationMusic Perception, 28
J. Iversen, Aniruddh Patel, Brenda Nicodemus, K. Emmorey (2014)
UC Office of the President Recent Work Title Synchronization to auditory and visual rhythms in hearing and deaf individuals Permalink
H. Pashler (2001)
Perception and production of brief durations: beat-based versus interval-based timing.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 27 2
B. Repp (2005)
Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literaturePsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12
(2009)
Timing dysfunctions
Amanda Pasinski, J. McAuley, J. Snyder (2016)
How modality specific is processing of auditory and visual rhythms?Psychophysiology, 53 2
S. Grondin (2010)
Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directionsAttention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72
Aniruddh Patel, J. Iversen, Yanqing Chen, B. Repp (2005)
The influence of metricality and modality on synchronization with a beatExperimental Brain Research, 163
B. Pollok, V. Krause, M. Butz, A. Schnitzler (2009)
Modality specific functional interaction in sensorimotor synchronizationHuman Brain Mapping, 30
Y. Shany (2014)
Two Sides of the Same Coin
Jessica Grahn (2012)
See what I hear? Beat perception in auditory and visual rhythmsExperimental Brain Research, 220
T. Rammsayer (2014)
The effects of type of interval, sensory modality, base duration, and psychophysical task on the discrimination of brief time intervalsAttention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76
L. Huber, Ulrike Aust, C. Cate, S. Healy (2017)
Mechanisms of Perceptual Categorization in Birds
Corinne Stauffer, Judith Haldemann, S. Troche, T. Rammsayer (2012)
Auditory and visual temporal sensitivity: evidence for a hierarchical structure of modality-specific and modality-independent levels of temporal information processingPsychological Research, 76
Philipp Berens (2009)
CircStat: AMATLABToolbox for Circular StatisticsJournal of Statistical Software, 31
Jutta Peterburs, Alexander Nitsch, W. Miltner, T. Straube (2013)
Impaired Representation of Time in Schizophrenia Is Linked to Positive Symptoms and Cognitive DemandPLoS ONE, 8
Sundeep Teki, M. Grube, Sukhbinder Kumar, T. Griffiths (2011)
Distinct Neural Substrates of Duration-Based and Beat-Based Auditory TimingThe Journal of Neuroscience, 31
W. Yee, S. Holleran, M. Jones (1994)
Sensitivity to event timing in regular and irregular sequences: Influences of musical skillPerception & Psychophysics, 56
S. Keele, R. Nicoletti, Richard Ivry, R. Pokorny (1989)
Mechanisms of perceptual timing: Beat-based or interval-based judgements?Psychological Research, 50
Sven Thoenes, D. Oberfeld (2017)
Meta-analysis of time perception and temporal processing in schizophrenia: Differential effects on precision and accuracy.Clinical psychology review, 54
H. Stanislaw, N. Todorov (1999)
Calculation of signal detection theory measuresBehavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31
M. Grube, Kwang-Hyuk Lee, T. Griffiths, A. Barker, P. Woodruff (2010)
Transcranial Magnetic Theta-Burst Stimulation of the Human Cerebellum Distinguishes Absolute, Duration-Based from Relative, Beat-Based Perception of Subsecond Time IntervalsFrontiers in Psychology, 1
S. Fujii, G. Schlaug (2013)
The Harvard Beat Assessment Test (H-BAT): a battery for assessing beat perception and production and their dissociationFrontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7
M. Hove, J. Iversen, Allen Zhang, B. Repp (2013)
Synchronization with competing visual and auditory rhythms: bouncing ball meets metronomePsychological Research, 77
Yi-Huang Su (2014)
Audiovisual beat induction in complex auditory rhythms: point-light figure movement as an effective visual beat.Acta psychologica, 151
Ying Cai, Zhisen Urgolites, Justin Wood, Chuansheng Chen, S. Li, Antao Chen, G. Xue (2018)
Distinct neural substrates for visual short‐term memory of actionsHuman Brain Mapping, 39
M. Hove, Michael Spivey, C. Krumhansl (2010)
Compatibility of motion facilitates visuomotor synchronization.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 36 6
B. Repp, A. Penel (2002)
Auditory dominance in temporal processing: new evidence from synchronization with simultaneous visual and auditory sequences.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 28 5
Sharon Guttman, L. Gilroy, R. Blake (2005)
Hearing What the Eyes SeePsychological Science, 16
It is known that moving visual stimuli (bouncing balls) have an advantage over static visual ones (flashes) in sensorimotor synchronization, such that the former match auditory beeps in driving synchronization while the latter do not. This occurs in beat-based synchronization but not in beat-based purely perceptual tasks, suggesting that the advantage is action-specific. The main goal of this study was to test the advantage of moving over static visual stimuli in a different perceptual timing system – duration-based perception – to determine whether the advantage is action-specific in a broad sense, i.e., if it excludes both beat-based and duration-based perception. We asked a group of participants to perform different tasks with three stimulus types: auditory beeps, visual bouncing balls (moving) and visual flashes (static). First, participants performed a duration-based perception task in which they judged whether intervals were speeding up or slowing down; then they did a synchronization task with isochronous sequences; finally, they performed a beat-based perception task in which they judged whether sequences sounded right or wrong. Bouncing balls outperformed flashes and matched beeps in synchronization. In the duration-based perceptual task, beeps, balls and flashes were equivalent, but in beat-based perception beeps outperformed balls and flashes. Our findings suggest that the advantage of moving over static visual stimuli is grounded on action rather than perception in a broad sense, in that it is absent in both beat-based and duration-based perception.
Timing & Time Perception – Brill
Published: Apr 25, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.