Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Criterion of Completeness in Avicenna’s Reorganization of the Predicables into a System of Notions Resulting in Concept Formation

The Criterion of Completeness in Avicenna’s Reorganization of the Predicables into a System of... The aim of the paper is to show that Avicenna’s reorganization of the division of the predicables into a system of notions ( maʿānī ) resulting in concept formation is the product of his attempt to integrate Aristotle’s different approaches to definition in a consistent system. The first approach is the method of defining things by the ‘what-is-it way’ ( ṭarīq mā huwa ) of the Topics . The second approach is the method of the Posterior Analytics and the Metaphysics , starting from something given and rewording the what-is-it question into the question ‘which kind of thing is it with regard to its essence.’ The third approach is the method of the De partibus animalium , starting from the genera of things and dividing them by different divisions whose ultimate differentiae are aggregated to a set of attributes which as a whole belong to the described thing alone. The third method is not appropriate in demonstration. From it may result completeness ( tamām ) of description. But only from the completeness of a real definition can be reached perfection ( kamāl ) of concept formation. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Oriens Brill

The Criterion of Completeness in Avicenna’s Reorganization of the Predicables into a System of Notions Resulting in Concept Formation

Oriens , Volume 44 (3-4): 386 – Jan 1, 2016

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/the-criterion-of-completeness-in-avicenna-s-reorganization-of-the-YhgYn3xhRj

References (1)

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright 2016 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
ISSN
0078-6527
eISSN
1877-8372
DOI
10.1163/18778372-04403006
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to show that Avicenna’s reorganization of the division of the predicables into a system of notions ( maʿānī ) resulting in concept formation is the product of his attempt to integrate Aristotle’s different approaches to definition in a consistent system. The first approach is the method of defining things by the ‘what-is-it way’ ( ṭarīq mā huwa ) of the Topics . The second approach is the method of the Posterior Analytics and the Metaphysics , starting from something given and rewording the what-is-it question into the question ‘which kind of thing is it with regard to its essence.’ The third approach is the method of the De partibus animalium , starting from the genera of things and dividing them by different divisions whose ultimate differentiae are aggregated to a set of attributes which as a whole belong to the described thing alone. The third method is not appropriate in demonstration. From it may result completeness ( tamām ) of description. But only from the completeness of a real definition can be reached perfection ( kamāl ) of concept formation.

Journal

OriensBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2016

Keywords: Avicenna; concept formation ( taṣawwur ); completeness; predicables; essential notions ( maʿānī ḏātiyya ); accidental notions ( maʿānī ʿaraḍiyya ); al-Fārābī; Alexander of Aphrodisias; Topics ; Ǧadal ; Madḫal

There are no references for this article.