Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
U. Bonn (2003)
Chromosome differentiation and the radiation of the butterfly subgenus Agrodiaetus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Polyommatus )
V. Lukhtanov, A. Dantchenko (2002)
Descriptions of new taxa of the genus Agrodiaetus Huebner, (1822) based on karyotype investigation (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae), 33
M. Munguira, J. Martínez (1994)
Karyology and distribution as tools in the taxonomy of Iberian Agrodiaetus butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), 17
(1961)
Bausteine zur Kenntnis der Gattung Agrodiaetus Scudd . ( Lep . Lycaen . )
V. Lukhtanov, Nikolai Kandul, J. Plotkin, A. Dantchenko, D. Haig, N. Pierce (2005)
Reinforcement of pre-zygotic isolation and karyotype evolution in Agrodiaetus butterfliesNature, 436
H. Macgregor, J. Varley (1983)
Working with Animal Chromosomes
F. Gil-T., T. Uceda (2005)
Agrodiaetus violetae (Gómez-Bustillo, Expósito & Martínez, 1979): morfología comparada y descripción de Agrodiaetus fabressei subbaeticus ssp. nov. del sureste de la Península Ibérica (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae)
M. Cummings (2004)
PAUP* [Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods)]Dictionary of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
A. Stekolnikov, V. Ivanov, V. Kuznetzov, V. Lukhtanov (2000)
Evolution of the chromosome mechanism, wing articulation, male genitalia, and phylogeny of butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea).Ėntomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 79
(2004)
Description d ’ une nouvelle sous - espèce d ’ Agrodiaetus ainsae Forster , 1961 provenant de la province de León ( Lep . Lycaenidae )
(1960)
Les nombres de chromosomes dans la classification du groupe d ’ Agrodiaetus ripartii FREYER ( Lepidoptera , Lycaenidae )
(1997)
Butterflies of Britain & Europe. 320 pp. 104 colour plates
Alena Rego, F. Marec (2004)
Telomeric and interstitial telomeric sequences in holokinetic chromosomes of Lepidoptera: Telomeric DNA mediates association between postpachytene bivalents in achiasmatic meiosis of femalesChromosome Research, 11
L. Higgins, N. Riley (1970)
A field guide to the butterflies of Britain and Europe
Ignasi Castellarnau
Anotacions a la Lepidopterologia ibèrica III : Formes noves dignes d'esment
(1996)
Family Lycaenidae
V. Lukhtanov, A. Dantchenko (2004)
Principles of the Highly Ordered Arrangement of Metaphase I Bivalents in Spermatocytes of Agrodiaetus (Insecta, Lepidoptera)Chromosome Research, 10
(2004)
Description d’une nouvelle sousespèce d’Agrodiaetus ainsae
K. Sahara, F. Marec, Ulrike Eickhoff, W. Traut (2003)
Moth sex chromatin probed by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).Genome, 46 2
(1989)
Speciation and its ontology: the empirical consequences of alternative species concepts for understanding patterns and processes of differentiation
K. Wolf, K. Novák, F. Marec (1997)
Kinetic organization of metaphase I bivalents in spermatogenesis of Lepidoptera and Trichoptera species with small chromosome numbersHeredity, 79
(1962)
Variation chromosomique chez Agrodiaetus dolus HB . ( Lep . , Lycaenidae )
(2003)
Karyology and Sex
(2003)
Description of a new species of the “ brown ” INSECT SYST . EVOL
Nikolai Kandul, V. Lukhtanov, A. Dantchenko, James Coleman, Ç. Şekercioğlu, D. Haig, N. Pierce (2004)
Phylogeny of Agrodiaetus Hübner 1822 (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) inferred from mtDNA sequences of COI and COII and nuclear sequences of EF1-alpha: karyotype diversification and species radiation.Systematic biology, 53 2
(1997)
An illustrated check - list of Agrodiaetus Hübner , 1822 , a subgenus of Polyommatus Latreille , 1804 ( Lepidotera : Lycaenidae )
<jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The Agrodiaetus dolus species group includes cryptic species that have similar external morphology but can be distinguished by their species-specific karyotypes. At the same time, cytogenetic analysis of these butterflies is difficult because of extremely high chromosome numbers. The application of common techniques, such as squash and spread preparations, usually yields inaccurate chromosome counting and, consequently, results in incorrect taxonomical conclusions. To overcome this problem, we combined cytological and molecular data. The former was obtained with a new cytological technique that allowed us to examine intact (notsquashed) metaphase plates and to distinguish all chromosomes in the chromosomal complement. The latter was obtained from published mitochondrial sequences that were used to calculate genetic distances between taxa. While the taxa ainsae and fulgens are generally considered as separate species, here we show that no characters exist that support this hypothesis. As a consequence, we propose several taxonomic changes within the A. dolus species complex and show that this group consists of the following species: A. dolus with haploid chromosome number n=122-125, A. fulgens (n=108-110) and A. fabressei (n=90). The following new combinations are suggested: A. fulgens ainsae comb. n., A. fulgens pseudovirgilius comb. n., A. fulgens leonensis comb. n. and A. fulgens magnabrillata comb. n.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
Insect Systematics & Evolution – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.