Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
The present contributions examines if and to what extent preliminary judgments by the Court of Justice were used as an enforcement tool and helped the full legal and practical application of eu environmental legislation. Looking at available data about the use of this procedure and at the enforcement practice of Member States and the eu commission it is concluded that neither the means of preliminary reference according to Article 267 nor the infringement procedure under Article 258 tfeu are systematically exploited for effective enforcement of eu environmental law. In particular, it becomes evident, that Commission does not assume its role as environmental law enforcement authority. It rather acts as an opportunist political body which sometimes takes into consideration the rule of law, but sometimes not.
Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law – Brill
Published: Dec 7, 2016
Keywords: Article 267 tfeu ; Article 258 tfeu ; eu Commission; enforcement; eu environmental law; infringement procedure; preliminary reference procedure; European Court of Justice
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.