Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Allen Hertzke (2004)
Freeing God's Children: The Unlikely Alliance for Global Human Rights
M. Mamdani, Saviors Darfur, Pantheon Books. (2010)
Saviors and Survivors: Darfur, Politics, and the War on TerrorEthics & International Affairs, 24
A. Roberts (1993)
Humanitarian war: military intervention and human rightsThe United Nations
T. Weiss (2004)
The Sunset of Humanitarian Intervention? The Responsibility to Protect in a Unipolar EraSecurity Dialogue, 35
A. Waal (2007)
Darfur and the Failure of the Responsibility to ProtectInternational Affairs, 83
A. Bellamy (2009)
Responsibility to protect : the global effort to end mass atrocities
A. Bellamy (2008)
The Responsibility to Protect and the problem of military interventionInternational Affairs, 84
S. Power (2002)
A Problem from Hell
Leslie Vinjamuri (2010)
Deterrence, Democracy, and the Pursuit of International JusticeEthics & International Affairs, 24
A. Bellamy (2005)
Responsibility to Protect or Trojan Horse? The Crisis in Darfur and Humanitarian Intervention after IraqEthics & International Affairs, 19
The politics of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) are interwoven with the ghosts of Rwanda and Srebrenica. Although R2P can clearly be seen as an attempt to legitimate intervening in sovereign states to protect human rights, the post-2001 emphasis of advocates on intervention actually reduced the chances of truly humanitarian action by complicating the calculations of sovereigns faced with unpredictable political risks. As the military dimension to R2P wanes, so the possibility of intervention on a truly humanitarian basis might increase. And thus, the real achievement of the last two decades, embedding the idea of civilian protection as an expectation, comes into view. It is harder than it was to publicly murder your own citizens with impunity . R2P has been a success, we might say, to the extent that it has helped establish the civilian protection principle. But the historical record suggests this emerging norm predates R2P. We can even interpret R2P as a decade-long interlude, a diversion, from the underlying trend toward establishing a post-Cold War norm of preventing atrocities against civilians. What we must not expect, in Syria as in Sri Lanka, is armed intervention in an internal conflict when the United States, China and Russia have vital and conflicting interests at stake.
Global Responsibility to Protect – Brill
Published: Jun 12, 2014
Keywords: R2P; protection of civilians; humanitarian intervention; genocide; Security Council; Darfur; Sri Lanka
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.