Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Dissenting and Separate Opinions At the World Court

Dissenting and Separate Opinions At the World Court NEW BOOKS DISSENTING AND SEPARATE OPINIONS AT THE WORLD COURT by Dr. IJAZ HUSSAIN Quaid-i-Azam University, Dept. of International Relations Islama- bad, Pakistan LEGAL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION 3 338 pp. Cloth Dfl. 145.00/£36.95 ISBN 90-247-2920-3 July 1984, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers Dissenting and Separate Opinions have been viewed by their authors as means of developing international law. A review of the jurisprudence of the present Court demonstrates that individual opinions, especially dis- senting opinions, have played the role assigned to them, and in a dialectical way. Thus, the clash of the natural law philosophies espoused through dissenting opinions and the positivism represented by judgments has been resulted in a new outlook in the Court. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Review of Socialist Law (in 1992 continued as Review of Central and East European Law) Brill

Dissenting and Separate Opinions At the World Court

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/dissenting-and-separate-opinions-at-the-world-court-UNO5LwwAya

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 1984 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0165-0300
eISSN
1875-2985
DOI
10.1163/187529884X00242
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

NEW BOOKS DISSENTING AND SEPARATE OPINIONS AT THE WORLD COURT by Dr. IJAZ HUSSAIN Quaid-i-Azam University, Dept. of International Relations Islama- bad, Pakistan LEGAL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION 3 338 pp. Cloth Dfl. 145.00/£36.95 ISBN 90-247-2920-3 July 1984, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers Dissenting and Separate Opinions have been viewed by their authors as means of developing international law. A review of the jurisprudence of the present Court demonstrates that individual opinions, especially dis- senting opinions, have played the role assigned to them, and in a dialectical way. Thus, the clash of the natural law philosophies espoused through dissenting opinions and the positivism represented by judgments has been resulted in a new outlook in the Court.

Journal

Review of Socialist Law (in 1992 continued as Review of Central and East European Law)Brill

Published: Jan 1, 1984

There are no references for this article.