Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Julian and Porphyry on the Resurrection of Jesus in the Gospels

Julian and Porphyry on the Resurrection of Jesus in the Gospels Julian, in a Syriac fragment of his Contra Galilaeos, attacked the resurrection narratives in Matthew and Mark, because they were inconsistent with each other concerning the time of the arrival of the women to the tomb, the nature of the being they met in the tomb, and the women’s subsequent actions. Other texts in Syriac and Latin indicate the probability that Julian took over the substance of his argument from Porphyry. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of the Platonic Tradition Brill

Julian and Porphyry on the Resurrection of Jesus in the Gospels

Download PDF
15 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/julian-and-porphyry-on-the-resurrection-of-jesus-in-the-gospels-T5WcN5xLSu

References (15)

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
1872-5082
eISSN
1872-5473
DOI
10.1163/18725473-12341349
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Julian, in a Syriac fragment of his Contra Galilaeos, attacked the resurrection narratives in Matthew and Mark, because they were inconsistent with each other concerning the time of the arrival of the women to the tomb, the nature of the being they met in the tomb, and the women’s subsequent actions. Other texts in Syriac and Latin indicate the probability that Julian took over the substance of his argument from Porphyry.

Journal

International Journal of the Platonic Tradition – Brill

Published: Oct 25, 2016

Keywords: Julian; resurrection narratives; Porphyry; Matthew 28:1, 2, 8; Mark 16:2, 5, 8

There are no references for this article.