Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
99. THE RELATIONSHIP OF TORAH AND PROMISE IN THE REDACTIONARY COMPOSITION OF THE PENTATEUCH Horst Seebass . I Old Testament stories want to be made accessible from their purpose, from their ending. Although this may not hold as an iron-clad unchangeable law, it remains a good rule of experience which merits further notice. The Penta- teuch, which M. Noth taught to be seen predominantly as a story,l ends with a very eloquent, uplifting as well as pain- fully unfulfilled scene of the death of Moses outside the promised land. In striking contrast to the tomb of the patriarchs at Hebron (Gen 23), God Himself ordained for Moses a burial place outside the land included in the promise. With the great Moses, to whom is erected at the climax of the Pentateuch, namely in Deuteronomy and its promulga- tion of law, a definitive monument as the revealer,2 the original and fundamental document of what is about to become the Old Testament's canonical way of faith remains out of the promised land, and enters not into the fulfillment. How this ending, this purpose of the Pentateuch is to be assessed, proceeds from its analogy, hence from the ori- gin of
Horizons in Biblical Theology – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1985
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.