Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/brill/matthew-as-performer-tradent-scribe-98hRiF0B9E
References (10)
-
M. Goodacre (2001)
The case against Q : studies in Markan priority and the synoptic problem -
Kelly Iverson (2016)
Oral Fixation or Oral Corrective? A Response to Larry HurtadoNew Testament Studies, 62
-
L. Hurtado (2014)
Oral Fixation and New Testament Studies? ‘Orality’, ‘Performance’ and Reading Texts in Early Christianity*New Testament Studies, 60
-
E. Sanders (1973)
The Overlaps of Mark and Q and the Synoptic ProblemNew Testament Studies, 19
-
Werner Kelber, W. Ong, R. Rust (1983)
The Oral and the Written Gospel: The Hermeneutics of Speaking and Writing in the Synoptic Tradition, Mark, Paul, and QTheology Today, 40
-
Rafael Rodríguez (2010)
Structuring Early Christian Memory: Jesus in Tradition, Performance and Text -
Robin Wagner-Pacifici, B. Schwartz (2002)
Abraham Lincoln and the Forge of National MemoryContemporary Sociology, 31
-
Reconstructing Mark: A Thought Experiment
-
A. Campbell, A. Lord (1961)
The Singer of TalesComparative Literature, 14
-
J. Weaks (2010)
Mark without Mark: Problematizing the reliability of a reconstructed text of Q
- Publisher
- Brill
- Copyright
- Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
- ISSN
- 1476-8690
- eISSN
- 1745-5197
- DOI
- 10.1163/17455197-01502003
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This is a review essay of Alan Kirk’s lnts monograph, Q in Matthew: Ancient Media, Memory, and Early Scribal Transmission of the Jesus Tradition (Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2016).
Journal
Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus – Brill
Published: Dec 11, 2017