Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

IOLR F orum ARIO (2012)

IOLR F orum ARIO (2012) In 2011 the International Law Commission (ILC) adopted the Articles on Responsibility of International Organizations (ARIO). 1 Subsequently, on 9 December 2011, the UN General Assembly adopted by consensus Resolution 66/100 in which it “takes note” of these articles. 2 This is therefore an appropriate moment for stocktaking, as the text of the ARIO has now been finalized, after a decade of discussions within the ILC, in the Sixth Committee of the UN General Assembly, in academic conferences and doctrine. In previous issues, IOLR has already paid attention to a number of specific topics relating to the ARIO. 3 In addition, an earlier Forum has examined in particular provisions of the ARIO relating to the relationship between the responsibility of international organizations and membership responsibility. 4 For this Forum, we have collected a wide variety of short opinions on the outcome of the ILC work on this topic. Authors were given pretty much carte blanche to discuss key questions such as the points of criticism that have been put forward in relation to the ARIO, as discussed in various reports by ILC Special Rapporteur Gaja and in the 2011 ILC report: is there sufficient practice for these draft http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Organizations Law Review Brill

IOLR F orum ARIO (2012)

Download PDF
6 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/iolr-f-orum-ario-2012-Qi0sTfaRiU

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2012 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
Subject
Articles
ISSN
1572-3739
eISSN
1572-3747
DOI
10.1163/15723747-00901010
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In 2011 the International Law Commission (ILC) adopted the Articles on Responsibility of International Organizations (ARIO). 1 Subsequently, on 9 December 2011, the UN General Assembly adopted by consensus Resolution 66/100 in which it “takes note” of these articles. 2 This is therefore an appropriate moment for stocktaking, as the text of the ARIO has now been finalized, after a decade of discussions within the ILC, in the Sixth Committee of the UN General Assembly, in academic conferences and doctrine. In previous issues, IOLR has already paid attention to a number of specific topics relating to the ARIO. 3 In addition, an earlier Forum has examined in particular provisions of the ARIO relating to the relationship between the responsibility of international organizations and membership responsibility. 4 For this Forum, we have collected a wide variety of short opinions on the outcome of the ILC work on this topic. Authors were given pretty much carte blanche to discuss key questions such as the points of criticism that have been put forward in relation to the ARIO, as discussed in various reports by ILC Special Rapporteur Gaja and in the 2011 ILC report: is there sufficient practice for these draft

Journal

International Organizations Law Review – Brill

Published: Jan 1, 2012

There are no references for this article.