Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The General Comment on Children in Street Situations: Insights into the Institutionalisation of Children’s Rights

The General Comment on Children in Street Situations: Insights into the Institutionalisation of... The drafting of the General Comment (gc) on Children in Street Situations (uncrc, 2016), whereby the sociological perspective (Lucchini, 1993, 1996, 2007; Stoecklin, 2000a, 2007) that informed this labelling becomes lost in translation, provides a convincing example of the ‘paradox of institutionalisation’ (Stammers, 2013). The vision of children’s “living rights” as the outcome of a structured process translating specific claims into an institutionalised set of norms (Hanson and Nieuwenhuys, 2013) is thus specified. Analysis of the labels used for “street children” underlines the transformability of signification, domination and legitimisation in the theory of structuration (Giddens, 1979, 1984). http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The International Journal of Children's Rights Brill

The General Comment on Children in Street Situations: Insights into the Institutionalisation of Children’s Rights

The International Journal of Children's Rights , Volume 25 (3-4): 53 – Nov 17, 2017

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/the-general-comment-on-children-in-street-situations-insights-into-the-J0Z0iLfde0

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0927-5568
eISSN
1571-8182
DOI
10.1163/15718182-02503014
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The drafting of the General Comment (gc) on Children in Street Situations (uncrc, 2016), whereby the sociological perspective (Lucchini, 1993, 1996, 2007; Stoecklin, 2000a, 2007) that informed this labelling becomes lost in translation, provides a convincing example of the ‘paradox of institutionalisation’ (Stammers, 2013). The vision of children’s “living rights” as the outcome of a structured process translating specific claims into an institutionalised set of norms (Hanson and Nieuwenhuys, 2013) is thus specified. Analysis of the labels used for “street children” underlines the transformability of signification, domination and legitimisation in the theory of structuration (Giddens, 1979, 1984).

Journal

The International Journal of Children's RightsBrill

Published: Nov 17, 2017

There are no references for this article.