Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Josef Fischer v. Austria

Josef Fischer v. Austria    [  ] JOSEF FISCHER v. AUSTRIA Right to a fair trial – violation Article 6, Section 1 It was unfair for the prosecution to make submissions to a court without the knowledge of the defence. In a judgment delivered on  January  in the case of Josef Fischer v. Austria , the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article  , Section  (right to a fair trial) of the Convention. Under Article  (just satisfaction), the Court unanimously held that the find- ing in itself constituted sufficient just satisfaction in respect of non-pecuniary dam- age. It awarded him  ,  .  euros (EUR) for costs and expenses. This judgment is not final. Pursuant to Article  , Section  of the Convention, within three months from the date of the judgment of a Chamber, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber.  . Principal facts Josef Fischer, an Austrian national, is an antique dealer. On  May  the Vienna Regional Court for Criminal Matters convicted the applicant on numerous http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Human Rights Case Digest Brill

Josef Fischer v. Austria

Human Rights Case Digest , Volume 13 (1-2): 27 – Jan 1, 2002
Download PDF
3 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/josef-fischer-v-austria-e2Chg3H4CW

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2002 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0965-934X
eISSN
1571-8131
DOI
10.1163/157181302760446366
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

   [  ] JOSEF FISCHER v. AUSTRIA Right to a fair trial – violation Article 6, Section 1 It was unfair for the prosecution to make submissions to a court without the knowledge of the defence. In a judgment delivered on  January  in the case of Josef Fischer v. Austria , the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article  , Section  (right to a fair trial) of the Convention. Under Article  (just satisfaction), the Court unanimously held that the find- ing in itself constituted sufficient just satisfaction in respect of non-pecuniary dam- age. It awarded him  ,  .  euros (EUR) for costs and expenses. This judgment is not final. Pursuant to Article  , Section  of the Convention, within three months from the date of the judgment of a Chamber, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber.  . Principal facts Josef Fischer, an Austrian national, is an antique dealer. On  May  the Vienna Regional Court for Criminal Matters convicted the applicant on numerous

Journal

Human Rights Case Digest – Brill

Published: Jan 1, 2002

There are no references for this article.