Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Initial prohibition on all contact between mother and child not based on sufficiently valid reasons, and subsequent delays and limited number of contacts with children did not have objective basis. Placement of children and their continued presence in community led in part by two persons with criminal convictions for ill-treatment and sexual abuse did not satisfy the right to respect for family life. Judgment of breach of the Convention imposed a legal obligation on State not just to pay compensation but to choose general and individual measures to put an end to the violation.
Human Rights Case Digest – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2000
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.