Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Protecting International Civil Rights in a National Context: Danish Law and Its Discontents

Protecting International Civil Rights in a National Context: Danish Law and Its Discontents The effective impact of international law on national civil rights protection is dependent on being implemented in a modality that allows for the actual use of international rules in domestic courts. With particular reference to the Danish case, this article investigates the effects of lack of ratification for the placement of civil rights in the ranking of sources of law, the issues arising from a dualist approach to international law, and the impact of judicial restraint in resolving conflicts of rights in practice. The study’s focal point is the legal rules and modalities for reception of international standards which can be, in any national legal context, more or less suitable for an appropriate protection of civil rights. The article’s enquiry aims to help revive a debate on these modalities for reception which in practice have a great impact on the effective realisation of civil rights, especially in judicial settings. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Nordic Journal of International Law Brill

Protecting International Civil Rights in a National Context: Danish Law and Its Discontents

Nordic Journal of International Law , Volume 85 (2): 119 – May 17, 2016

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/protecting-international-civil-rights-in-a-national-context-danish-law-5cw1MZosb4

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2016 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
Subject
Articles
ISSN
0902-7351
eISSN
1571-8107
DOI
10.1163/15718107-08502004
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The effective impact of international law on national civil rights protection is dependent on being implemented in a modality that allows for the actual use of international rules in domestic courts. With particular reference to the Danish case, this article investigates the effects of lack of ratification for the placement of civil rights in the ranking of sources of law, the issues arising from a dualist approach to international law, and the impact of judicial restraint in resolving conflicts of rights in practice. The study’s focal point is the legal rules and modalities for reception of international standards which can be, in any national legal context, more or less suitable for an appropriate protection of civil rights. The article’s enquiry aims to help revive a debate on these modalities for reception which in practice have a great impact on the effective realisation of civil rights, especially in judicial settings.

Journal

Nordic Journal of International LawBrill

Published: May 17, 2016

Keywords: international law; civil rights; Denmark; judicial protection; conflict of rights; continental legal positivism

There are no references for this article.