Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Johnson, William Donohue, C. Atkin, Sally Johnson (1995)
Differences Between Organizational and Communication Factors Related to Contrasting InnovationsJournal of Business Communication, 32
J. Ulijn, J. Wynstra, A. Lincke (2002)
The effect of Dutch and German cultures on negotiation strategy comparing operations and innovation management in the supply chainSoftware Process: Improvement and Practice
Jan, M., Ulijn, A. Lincke, Y. Karakaya (2001)
Non-face-to face international business negotiation: how is national culture reflected in this mediumIEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 44
J. Ulijn, Maurits Verweij (2000)
Questioning Behaviour in Monocultural and Intercultural Technical Business Negotiations: The Dutch—Spanish ConnectionDiscourse Studies, 2
D. Te’eni, A. Sagie, D. Schwartz, Nurit Zaidman, Yair Amichai-Hamburger (2001)
The process of organizational communication: a model and field studyIEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 44
Ringo Ma (1996)
Computer-mediated conversations as a new dimension of intercultural communication between East Asian and North American college studentsPragmatics and beyond. New series, 39
E. Hall (1959)
The Silent Language
Christopher Hobson (1999)
E-Negotiations: Creating a Framework for Online Commercial NegotiationsNegotiation Journal, 15
J. Gibbons, S. Chakraborti (2020)
Nonparametric Statistical Inference
R. Fisher, Willliam Ury, Bruce Patton (1981)
Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving in
W. Robinson, Vecheslav Volkov (1998)
Supporting the negotiation life cycleCommun. ACM, 41
Simeon Yates (1996)
Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing
D. Murray (1991)
Conversation for Action: The Computer Terminal as Medium of Communication
E. Hall (1998)
Three domains of culture and the triune brain
M. Poole, D. Shannon, G. DeSanctis (1992)
Communication Media and Negotiation Processes
A. Wong, D. Tjosvold (2004)
Innovating across cultural boundaries : applying conflict theory to develop a common approachInternational Negotiation, 9
M. Collot, N. Belmore (1996)
Electric language : A new variety of EnglishPragmatics and beyond. New series, 39
J. Ulijn, R. Kumar (2000)
Technical communication in a multicultural world: How to make it an asset in managing international business, lessons from Europe and Asia for the 21st century.
D. Vogel, M. Genuchten, D. Lou, S. Verveen, M. Eekhout, Tony Adams (2000)
Distributed experimental learning: the Hong Kong-Netherlands projectProceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
A. Donnellon (1996)
Team Talk: The Power of Language in Team Dynamics
C. Werry (1996)
Linguistic and interactional features of Internet relay chatPragmatics and beyond. New series, 39
<jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The growing significance of global electronic commerce has led to the increased use of computer support during negotiation of deals, which until now has been carried out almost exclusively via face-to-face (FTF) communication or other high-feedback media (e. g., telephone), but not via computer-mediated communication (CMC). To analyze this process and its outcomes, the following research questions were examined in this study: How do CMC and FTF contribute to a win-win strategy in negotiation? How do CMC and FTF affect the participants' ability to empathize with each other? Are the negotiation strategies of Anglo, Nordic, and Latin negotiators affected differently depending on the medium? Is the ability of Anglo, Nordic, and Latin negotiators to empathize with each other affected differently depending on the medium? On the basis of our results, we surmise that CMC does not allow negotiators to employ a cooperative win-win strategy (as recommended by negotiation-strategy training). We see significant differences when we examine the use of personal pronouns and speech acts by the Anglo, Nordic, and Latin culture clusters. When we look at the use of cooperative speech acts, a similar situation occurs: in contrast to Anglos, who behave in a cooperative way, Latins are significantly less cooperative and Nordics use many more general speech acts in the CMC setting.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
International Negotiation – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2004
Keywords: NEGOTIATION STRATEGY; PERSONAL PRONOUN USAGE; COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION (CMC); NEGOTIATION SUPPORT SYSTEMS (NSS); FACE-TO-FACE (FTF) COMMUNICATION; SPEECH ACT ANALYSIS
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.