Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J Barker (2006)
I. Case Concerning the Frontier Dispute (Benin/Niger)International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 55
Z. Reghizzi (2021)
The Chagos Advisory Opinion and the Principle of Consent to Adjudication
Application of the Genocide Convention (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Provisional Measures, Separate Opinion of Judge ad hoc Kress
But there is a sense of definitiveness in how the Court approaches it in the Order that casts some doubt as to whether Vice-President Xue's protestations will find much purchase in the bench
Joint Declaration of Judges Tomka, Gaja and Gevorgian, para. 2; Declaration of Judge Salam, para. 1
Separate Opinion of Judge Cançado Trindade, para. 11. 137 Ibid., para
Application of the Genocide Convention (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Provisional Measures, Separate Opinion of Vice-President Xue
Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Donoghue, para
Application of CERD, Order of 14
D. Amann (2019)
Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965American Journal of International Law, 113
David Keane (2021)
Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Qatar v. U.A.E.) (I.C.J.)International Legal Materials, 60
Application of the Genocide Convention (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Provisional Measures, Separate Opinion of Judge Cançado Trindade
(2022)
Reports of Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders 2020: Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda)Reports of Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders
The present column covers procedural developments at the International Court of Justice in the period spanning from 1 June 2014 to 30 June 2015. These include: the scope of the Court’s jurisdiction ratione temporis under a compromissory clause in the context of State succession; the admissibility of new arguments presented during oral hearings; the burden, standard and methods of proof in cases involving State responsibility for international crimes; and revocation of provisional measures in light of a change in the situation that warranted them.
The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals – Brill
Published: Aug 24, 2015
Keywords: International Court of Justice; procedural developments; jurisdiction ratione temporis ; proof; provisional measures
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.