Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Pastoral Supervision Assessment

Pastoral Supervision Assessment 33 WILLEM PUTMAN & HANS SCHILDERMAN PASTORAL SUPERVISION ASSESSMENT ABSTRACT This article presents a technique for assessing the pastoral supervision process. First we interpret supervision analytically and clarify its relevance by highlighting a typical problem in pastoral supervision, namely role tension. We then present the self-confronta- tion method, based on valuation theory, as a means of supervision assessment. Subse- quently we illustrate its use by describing a case study of supervision that was analysed using this technique. Finally, we discuss the constraints and potential of this assessment technique in pastoral supervision. Elicitors for supervision assessment are provided in an appendix. 1. Supervision Model An important part of supervision is to identify the learning requirements of appropriating professional roles. Supervision can be described analytically as interplay of three practices. First we have the social practice, in which the client interacts in the social context that represents a major part of the raw material for the supervision of supervisees in their internship or training situation.' Thus the social practice is that of clients grappling with their social context in a way that indicates a more or less objective need for professional intervention of some kind. Aspects of this social practice http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Empirical Theology Brill

Pastoral Supervision Assessment

Putman, Willem; Schilderman, Hans
Journal of Empirical Theology , Volume 16 (2): 33 – Jan 1, 2003
Download PDF
17 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/pastoral-supervision-assessment-J1ro5kMVmq

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2003 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0922-2936
eISSN
1570-9256
DOI
10.1163/157092503X00026
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

33 WILLEM PUTMAN & HANS SCHILDERMAN PASTORAL SUPERVISION ASSESSMENT ABSTRACT This article presents a technique for assessing the pastoral supervision process. First we interpret supervision analytically and clarify its relevance by highlighting a typical problem in pastoral supervision, namely role tension. We then present the self-confronta- tion method, based on valuation theory, as a means of supervision assessment. Subse- quently we illustrate its use by describing a case study of supervision that was analysed using this technique. Finally, we discuss the constraints and potential of this assessment technique in pastoral supervision. Elicitors for supervision assessment are provided in an appendix. 1. Supervision Model An important part of supervision is to identify the learning requirements of appropriating professional roles. Supervision can be described analytically as interplay of three practices. First we have the social practice, in which the client interacts in the social context that represents a major part of the raw material for the supervision of supervisees in their internship or training situation.' Thus the social practice is that of clients grappling with their social context in a way that indicates a more or less objective need for professional intervention of some kind. Aspects of this social practice

Journal

Journal of Empirical Theology – Brill

Published: Jan 1, 2003

There are no references for this article.