Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Some Errors in the Legatio of Athenagoras

Some Errors in the Legatio of Athenagoras SOME ERRORS IN THE LEGATIO OF ATHENAGORAS BY ROBERT M. GRANT As in the case of most early Christian apologies, the Legatio of Athenagoras has been transmitted to us through one manuscript. Here it is the Arethas Codex of the year 914 (Cod. Paris. gr. 451, f. 322"-348'). The most conspicuous error in it occurs from f. 326v, to 327"1, where a passage later correctly placed at f. 330'-a has been inserted in the middle of a sentence. A striking example of a gloss which has slipped into the text is found in f. 334" (Leg. 18, 6 Ubaldi- Pellegrino), where an Orpliic line is cited as ojvsxa tctc,uu???jQCOorcv i§ zc,u?jQCaacvoaQ??v. What has happened, as Stephanus noted, is that an explanation (half right, half wrong) of zcQaQ??v has been inserted between the first and the second syllables of the word. This fact encourages us to agree with the various editors who have suspected the existence of other glosses in Leg. 14, 1 (p. 64b Otto, n. 10 : xai 'Hal'obog M?jBecav ? Nt' ofl 2?v), 17, 4 (p. 80a-b Otto, n. 27: mat' 45etbt'ov 1'à Aot7til and 20, 2 (pp. 92b-93a Otto, n. 7 : dr?,u?jzo?os With Diels http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Vigiliae Christianae Brill

Some Errors in the Legatio of Athenagoras

Vigiliae Christianae , Volume 12 (1): 145 – Jan 1, 1958

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/some-errors-in-the-legatio-of-athenagoras-bLydPcad6k

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 1958 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0042-6032
eISSN
1570-0720
DOI
10.1163/157007258X00159
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

SOME ERRORS IN THE LEGATIO OF ATHENAGORAS BY ROBERT M. GRANT As in the case of most early Christian apologies, the Legatio of Athenagoras has been transmitted to us through one manuscript. Here it is the Arethas Codex of the year 914 (Cod. Paris. gr. 451, f. 322"-348'). The most conspicuous error in it occurs from f. 326v, to 327"1, where a passage later correctly placed at f. 330'-a has been inserted in the middle of a sentence. A striking example of a gloss which has slipped into the text is found in f. 334" (Leg. 18, 6 Ubaldi- Pellegrino), where an Orpliic line is cited as ojvsxa tctc,uu???jQCOorcv i§ zc,u?jQCaacvoaQ??v. What has happened, as Stephanus noted, is that an explanation (half right, half wrong) of zcQaQ??v has been inserted between the first and the second syllables of the word. This fact encourages us to agree with the various editors who have suspected the existence of other glosses in Leg. 14, 1 (p. 64b Otto, n. 10 : xai 'Hal'obog M?jBecav ? Nt' ofl 2?v), 17, 4 (p. 80a-b Otto, n. 27: mat' 45etbt'ov 1'à Aot7til and 20, 2 (pp. 92b-93a Otto, n. 7 : dr?,u?jzo?os With Diels

Journal

Vigiliae ChristianaeBrill

Published: Jan 1, 1958

There are no references for this article.