Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Are historians of religions necessarily believers ? The social sciences and the truth of religious belief
J. Platvoet (1990)
The Definers Defined: Traditions in the Definition of ReligionMethod & Theory in The Study of Religion, 2
F. Secret (1974)
Du De occulta philosophia l'occultisme du XIXe sicleRevue Philosophique de Louvain
Q. Skinner (1969)
Meaning and understanding in the history of ideasHistory and Theory, 8
A. Woodhouse (2015)
Professor Lovejoy and the History of IdeasUniversity of Toronto Quarterly, 19
P. Wiener (1946)
Logical Significance of the History of ThoughtJournal of the History of Ideas, 7
D. Merkur (1994)
Reductions of a Working Historian
V. Mcgill (1963)
Epistemological Dualism and the Partition
(1983)
On Lovejoy ' s historiography
The hermetic tradition in Renaissance science
(1989)
Eliade's "aversion to history, especially to 'historicism'", which Rudolph calls remarkable for a man who would be und erstood as a "historian" of religions
Daniel Wilson (1987)
Lovejoy's The Great Chain of Being after Fifty YearsJournal of the History of Ideas, 48
AbstractThe debate initiated by Segal's "defense of reductionism" has produced a polarization between the theoretical positions of reductionism and religionism, suggesting that no alternative exists. This is unfortunate, for empirical research is neither reductionist nor religionist. The article discusses this neglected empirical option. Empirical research must be based on methodological agnosticism with regard to religious and philosophical "first principles", and must fully recognize the historicity of religious phenomena. This empirical perspective is applied to the newly emerging academic field of esotericism. Antoine Faivre's definition of esotericism as a historically recognizable "form of thought" leads to a discussion of the empirical status of the history of (religious) ideas, especially in the tradition of Arthur O. Lovejoy. This is followed by a discussion of the implications of empirical method for the diachronic and the synchronic study of esotericism. It is argued that the latter pursuit entails a fundamental questioning of conventional distinctions, particularly between "gnosticism" and "mysticism".
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1995
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.