Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Pendleton, Hopkins
Association of American Colleges, 8
Afterword: Religious Studies: Whither (wither) and why? JONATHAN Z. SMITH When I began as a teaching assistant some years ago, a senior professor offered the advice, "studies of religion will flourish so long as they continue to stand on the body of divinity." The image this conjured in my mind was striking, some Christian version of a Purusha-type primordial sacrifice, and though I was disappointed to learn, after some days of diligent and discrete inquiry, that the phrase was, in fact, a somewhat archaic way of denoting the traditional Protestant divinity school curriculum leading to the Bachelor of Divinity degree, the phrase has stuck. Indeed, there are even times when, surveying the current scene, I regretfully entertain the fleeting and unlikely suspicion that it might be so. For the warning posed an issue, fiercely fought in the 1960s, expressed as a choice between seminary studies and university studies, between the teaching of and the teaching about religion, between theological and religious studies. I have a good part of a bookcase in my office filled with publications devoted to such choices, all with respect to a single context: the teaching of religion in a state (public) university. It is
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1995
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.