Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Luhmann (1993)
Observing Re-entriesGraduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 16
Achille Mbembe (2019)
On the Postcolony
B. Lincoln (1999)
Theorizing Myth: Narrative, Ideology, and Scholarship
P. Maddy (2007)
The logical structure of the world
V. Mudimbe (2014)
THE INVENTION OF AFRICA Gnosis, Philosophy, and the Order of Knowledge1
H. Blumenberg (1985)
Work on myth
J. Bayart (2002)
The illusion of cultural identity
Albert Réville
Les religions des peuples non-civilisés
J. Jensen (2011)
Revisiting the Insider-Outsider Debate: Dismantling a Pseudo-problem in the Study of ReligionMethod & Theory in The Study of Religion, 23
A. Dieng (1989)
Hommage à Cheikh Anta Diop, 1923–1986: Un bilan critique de l'oeuvre de Cheikh Anta DiopCanadian Journal of African Studies, 23
A. Macintyre (1964)
Is Understanding Religion Compatible with Believing
N. Luhmann (2006)
System as DifferenceOrganization, 13
J. Lubbock
The Origin of Civilisation, and the Primitive Condition of Man: Mental and Social Condition of SavagesNature, 11
W. Evans (1980)
From the Land of Canaan to the Land of Guinea: The Strange Odyssey of the “Sons of Ham”The American Historical Review, 85
Edith Sanders (1969)
The hamitic hyopthesis; its origin and functions in time perspeciveThe Journal of African History, 10
R. Mccutcheon (1999)
The Insider/Outsider Problem in the Study of Religion: A Reader
D. Chidester (1996)
Savage Systems: Colonialism and Comparative Religion in Southern Africa
This article presents a formalized way to distinguish different regimes of truth in the historiography of religion. By focusing on the nineteenth-century European discourse on the origins of humanity and its (primal) religion in Africa, I will show how narratives of the origin always oscillate between a scientific and a religious regime of truth. The article further outlines a possible method to formally differentiate between insider and outsider positions by redefining them as the assignment to a certain way of organizing a discourse or a semantic field according to a regime of truth . A discourse analysis and sociology of knowledge approach reveals possibilities to distinguish different constructions of insider perspectives by heuristically identifying codes, rarefactions, rules of formations, and regimes of truth.
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion – Brill
Published: Nov 17, 2016
Keywords: history of science; religion; Africa; Europe; discourse
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.