Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Bruce Lincoln's “Theses on Method”: Antitheses

Bruce Lincoln's “Theses on Method”: Antitheses © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2006 Method & Theory in the Study of Religion Also available online – www.brill.nl 18, 392-423 1 I am grateful to Professor Lincoln for con fi rming by email that he still stands by these theses. I am also grateful to Greg Alles for carefully reading this article one stage back and making me more sensitive to the possible context of intellectual struggles within the Chicago Divinity School. However, as a reader of the “theses on method” and as someone not privy to these internal struggles, I have only been able to take the theses at face value, albeit in conjunction with some of his Professor Lincoln’s other writings. BRUCE LINCOLN’S “THESES ON METHOD”: ANTITHESES T im F itzgerald 1. Introdution It is 10 years since the well-known scholar of Religion Bruce Lincoln nailed his theses to the door of the church, the church in this case being this journal (“Theses on Method” in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion vol. 8 (1996): 225-27). 1 Bruce Lincoln is an important writer in Religious Studies, a prominent and fruitfully vocal member of the Divinity School at Chicago, where he is Caroline E. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Method & Theory in the Study of Religion Brill

Bruce Lincoln's “Theses on Method”: Antitheses

Fitzgerald, Tim
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion , Volume 18 (4): 392 – Jan 1, 2006
Download PDF
32 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/bruce-lincoln-s-theses-on-method-antitheses-hwB2VgzNfu

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 2006 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0943-3058
eISSN
1570-0682
DOI
10.1163/157006806778665521
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2006 Method & Theory in the Study of Religion Also available online – www.brill.nl 18, 392-423 1 I am grateful to Professor Lincoln for con fi rming by email that he still stands by these theses. I am also grateful to Greg Alles for carefully reading this article one stage back and making me more sensitive to the possible context of intellectual struggles within the Chicago Divinity School. However, as a reader of the “theses on method” and as someone not privy to these internal struggles, I have only been able to take the theses at face value, albeit in conjunction with some of his Professor Lincoln’s other writings. BRUCE LINCOLN’S “THESES ON METHOD”: ANTITHESES T im F itzgerald 1. Introdution It is 10 years since the well-known scholar of Religion Bruce Lincoln nailed his theses to the door of the church, the church in this case being this journal (“Theses on Method” in Method & Theory in the Study of Religion vol. 8 (1996): 225-27). 1 Bruce Lincoln is an important writer in Religious Studies, a prominent and fruitfully vocal member of the Divinity School at Chicago, where he is Caroline E.

Journal

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion – Brill

Published: Jan 1, 2006

There are no references for this article.