Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Arab Population in Hurāsān during the Umayyad Period

The Arab Population in Hurāsān during the Umayyad Period 1 With respect to this issue, modern scholarship may be divided into two broad schools. The Ž rst, or “classical” school, vouches for a predominantly Iranian identity of the Revolution, and is best represented by: Wellhausen, Julius, The Arab Kingdom and its Fall , tr. M.G. Weir, Calcutta, University of Calcutta, 1927 (Original: Das arabische Reich und sein Sturz , 1902); also Vloten, G. van, al-Siy ˆ da al- ’ Arabiyya wa al- Ó“’ a wa al-Isr ˆ"“ liyy ˆ t f “ ’ Ahd Ban “ Umayya , tr. î .I. î asan and M.Z. Ibr ˆ h “ m, Cairo, 1934 (Original: Recherches sur la domination arabe, le chi ’ isme et les croyances messianiques sous les Omayyades , Amsterdam, 1894). The second, or “revisionist” school, which dominated the Ž eld in the last sev- eral decades, vouches for a predominantly Arab identity of the Revolution, and is rep- resented by: Dennett, Daniel, “Marw ˆ n ibn Mu ú ammad—The Passing of the Umayyad Caliphate” (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis), Harvard University, 1939; Omar, Farouk, The ’ Abb ˆ sid Caliphate, 132/750-170/ 786 , Baghdad, The National Printing and Publishing Co., 1969; Shaban, M.A., The ’ Abb ˆ http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Arabica Brill

The Arab Population in Hurāsān during the Umayyad Period

Arabica , Volume 46 (2): 211 – Jan 1, 1999

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/the-arab-population-in-hur-s-n-during-the-umayyad-period-de4xk7KVEx

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 1999 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0570-5398
eISSN
1570-0585
DOI
10.1163/157005899774229366
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

1 With respect to this issue, modern scholarship may be divided into two broad schools. The Ž rst, or “classical” school, vouches for a predominantly Iranian identity of the Revolution, and is best represented by: Wellhausen, Julius, The Arab Kingdom and its Fall , tr. M.G. Weir, Calcutta, University of Calcutta, 1927 (Original: Das arabische Reich und sein Sturz , 1902); also Vloten, G. van, al-Siy ˆ da al- ’ Arabiyya wa al- Ó“’ a wa al-Isr ˆ"“ liyy ˆ t f “ ’ Ahd Ban “ Umayya , tr. î .I. î asan and M.Z. Ibr ˆ h “ m, Cairo, 1934 (Original: Recherches sur la domination arabe, le chi ’ isme et les croyances messianiques sous les Omayyades , Amsterdam, 1894). The second, or “revisionist” school, which dominated the Ž eld in the last sev- eral decades, vouches for a predominantly Arab identity of the Revolution, and is rep- resented by: Dennett, Daniel, “Marw ˆ n ibn Mu ú ammad—The Passing of the Umayyad Caliphate” (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis), Harvard University, 1939; Omar, Farouk, The ’ Abb ˆ sid Caliphate, 132/750-170/ 786 , Baghdad, The National Printing and Publishing Co., 1969; Shaban, M.A., The ’ Abb ˆ

Journal

ArabicaBrill

Published: Jan 1, 1999

There are no references for this article.