Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
1 With respect to this issue, modern scholarship may be divided into two broad schools. The rst, or “classical” school, vouches for a predominantly Iranian identity of the Revolution, and is best represented by: Wellhausen, Julius, The Arab Kingdom and its Fall , tr. M.G. Weir, Calcutta, University of Calcutta, 1927 (Original: Das arabische Reich und sein Sturz , 1902); also Vloten, G. van, al-Siy ˆ da al- ’ Arabiyya wa al- Ó“’ a wa al-Isr ˆ"“ liyy ˆ t f “ ’ Ahd Ban “ Umayya , tr. î .I. î asan and M.Z. Ibr ˆ h “ m, Cairo, 1934 (Original: Recherches sur la domination arabe, le chi ’ isme et les croyances messianiques sous les Omayyades , Amsterdam, 1894). The second, or “revisionist” school, which dominated the eld in the last sev- eral decades, vouches for a predominantly Arab identity of the Revolution, and is rep- resented by: Dennett, Daniel, “Marw ˆ n ibn Mu ú ammad—The Passing of the Umayyad Caliphate” (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis), Harvard University, 1939; Omar, Farouk, The ’ Abb ˆ sid Caliphate, 132/750-170/ 786 , Baghdad, The National Printing and Publishing Co., 1969; Shaban, M.A., The ’ Abb ˆ
Arabica – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1999
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.