Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Luc, M. Doucet, R. Fortuner, P. Castillo, W. Decraemer, P. Lax (2010)
Usefulness of morphological data for the study of nematode biodiversityNematology, 12
D. Martín-Vega, A. Baz, V. Michelsen (2010)
Back from the dead: Thyreophora cynophila (Panzer, 1798) (Diptera: Piophilidae) ‘globally extinct’ fugitive in SpainSystematic Entomology, 35
K. Izawa (2010)
Resurrection of the parasitic copepod genus Achtheinus Wilson, 1908 (Siphonostomatoida, Pandaridae), with redescription of A. oblongus Wilson, 1908, A. dentatus Wilson, 1911, and A. pinguis Wilson, 1912 based on museum collections.Crustaceana, 83
Wheeler Q.D. Valdecasas A.G.
Ten challenges to transform taxonomy
W. Bert, H. Okada, I. Tavernier, G. Borgonie, Wouter Houthoofd (2010)
Morphological, morphometrical and molecular characterisation of Filenchus fungivorus n. sp., a fungivorous nematode from Japan in a most likely polyphyletic genus (Nematoda: Tylenchina)Nematology, 12
Q. Wheeler (2008)
Introductory: Toward The New Taxonomy
Häuser C.L. Steiner A. Holstein J. Scoble M.
E-Types – a new resource for taxonomic research
H. Steel, T. Moens, A. Scholaert, M. Boshoff, Wouter Houthoofd, W. Bert (2011)
Mononchoides composticola n. sp. (Nematoda:Diplogastridae) associated with composting processes: morphological, molecular and autecological characterisationNematology, 13
Ian King, M. Mundo‐Ocampo, P. Ley (2010)
Xyala finneyae sp. n. (Nematoda: Xyalidae) from the intertidal region of the eastern Gulf of California, MexicoNematology, 12
G. Múnera, W. Bert, W. Decraemer (2009)
Morphological and molecular characterisation of Pratylenchus araucensis n. sp. (Pratylenchidae), a root-lesion nematode associated with Musa plants in Colombia.Nematology, 11
H. Wägele, A. Klussmann‐Kolb, M. Kuhlmann, G. Haszprunar, D. Lindberg, André Koch, J. Wägele (2011)
The taxonomist - an endangered race. A practical proposal for its survivalFrontiers in Zoology, 8
M. Jiménez, J. Paretas-martínez, J. Pujade-Villar (2008)
Revision of Xyalophora Kieffer and description of Xyalophoroides gen. n. (Hymenoptera: Figitidae: Figitinae)European Journal of Endocrinology, 105
A. Suarez, N. Tsutsui (2004)
The Value of Museum Collections for Research and Society, 54
Itaki T. Khim B.-K.
Radiolarians from the British North-Polar Expedition (1875-1876): re-examination of the H.B.
P. Ley, W. Bert (2002)
Video capture and editing as a tool for the storage, distribution, and illustration of morphological characters of nematodes.Journal of nematology, 34 4
H. Townson, R. Harbach, Tara Callan (1999)
DNA identification of museum specimens of the Anopheles gambiae complex: an evaluation of PCR as a tool for resolving the formal taxonomy of sibling species complexesSystematic Entomology, 24
J. Mcneely (2002)
The role of taxonomy in conserving biodiversityJournal for Nature Conservation, 10
Z. Handoo, A. Golden, D. Ellington (1998)
Type specimens on deposit in the United States department of agriculture nematode collection, beltsville, Maryland.Journal of nematology, 30 1
Eyualem-Abebe, J. Baldwin, B. Adams, Duane Hope, S. Gardner, R. Huettel, P. Mullin, Topper Powers, J. Sharma, W. Ye, W. Thomas (2006)
A position paper on the electronic publication of nematode taxonomic manuscripts.Journal of nematology, 38 3
Q. Wheeler, A. Valdecasas (2005)
Diez retos para transformar la TaxonomíaGraellsia, 61
J. Padial, Aurélien Miralles, I. Riva, M. Vences (2010)
The integrative future of taxonomyFrontiers in Zoology, 7
S. Knapp (2008)
Taxonomy As A Team Sport
Eyualem Abebe, J. Sharma, M. Mundo‐Ocampo, T. Platt (2012)
Testudinema gilchristi n. gen., n. sp. (Nematoda: Monhysteridae) from the perianal folds of stinkpot turtles, Sternotherus odoratus (Testudines), USANematology, 14
M. Scoble (2008)
Networks And Their Role In E-taxonomy
Hauser (2005)
Introduction
M. Hooge, A. Wallberg, C. Todt, A. Maloy, U. Jondelius, S. Tyler (2007)
A revision of the systematics of panther worms (Hofstenia spp., Acoela), with notes on color variation and genetic variation within the genusHydrobiologia, 592
M. Ebach, A. Valdecasas, Q. Wheeler (2011)
Impediments to taxonomy and users of taxonomy: accessibility and impact evaluationCladistics, 27
Eyualem Abebe, R. Grizzle, Duane Hope, W. Thomas (2004)
Nematode diversity in the Gulf of Maine, USA, and a Web-accessible, relational databaseJournal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 84
M. Mundo‐Ocampo, J. Baldwin (2010)
Type specimens deposited at the University of California Riverside Nematode CollectionNematology, 12
W. Wouts (1996)
The National Nematode Collection of New ZealandNew Zealand Journal of Zoology, 23
T. Itaki, B. Khim (2007)
Radiolarians from the British North‐Polar Expedition (1875–1876): re‐examination of the H. B. Brady (1878) collectionJournal of Natural History, 41
B. Stuart, U. Fritz (2008)
Historical DNA from museum type specimens clarifies diversity of Asian leaf turtles (Cyclemys)Biological Journal of The Linnean Society, 94
S. Bandoni, D. Duszynski (1988)
A plea for improved presentation of type material for coccidia.The Journal of parasitology, 74 4
A. Khuroo, G. Dar, Z. Khan, A. Malik (2007)
Exploring an inherent interface between taxonomy and biodiversity: Current problems and future challengesJournal for Nature Conservation, 15
N. Rastegar-Pouyani (2000)
Taxonomic status of Trapelus ruderatus (Olivier) and T. persicus (Blanford), and validity of T. lessonae (De Filippi)Amphibia-reptilia, 21
We assessed 301 taxonomic papers published in nine journals between 1999-2011 to determine the use of type specimens and to evaluate the habitat focus and the number of new species described per year. A total of ca 100 new nematode species were described every year, primarily from terrestrial habitats. Two-thirds were terrestrial, 16% were aquatic and the remaining 9% were animal-parasitic nematodes. Only 2.5% of the taxonomic literature reported a comparative study of type material for making a decision on the identity of the target taxon. The overwhelming majority ( i.e. , 97.5%) relied only on literature comparisons. Our closer scrutiny of the 61 papers revealed a number of shared problems: a third stated that inadequacy of original descriptions, or unavailability/inaccessibility of type specimens had hindered them from unequivocally determining the identity of their species. Fourteen percent reported a discrepancy between the text descriptions and the illustrations, and a tenth revealed the absence of designated types for taxa relevant to their work. A similar number indicated deterioration of types to be a reason for either making wrong conclusions in previous descriptions, or for rendering their descriptions incomplete. We argue for E-typing of nematodes as a solution to enhance the future accessibility of type specimens. We stress the need for a concerted effort between museum curators, nematological journals and nematological societies to address the problem and thereby to forge a brighter future for the science.
Nematology – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 2014
Keywords: habitat bias; species descriptions; taxonomy; type material
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.