Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
117 grinding at the mill; one shall be taken and the other left" (Matt. xxiv 21) = "if there be two women grinding ..." The apodosis, I submit, states the legal consequences of an uxorilocal marriage, if and when this took place. "Flesh" in this context can only, it seems to me, be a legal term for clan membership: to say therefore that a man who abandons his parental clan thereby becomes "one flesh" with his wife implies en- try into membership of the wife's clan, with all its attendant rights and obligations-particularly, no doubt, in the domains of in- heritance and the blood-feud system. A striking linguistic parallel for this is furnished by the mediaeval Arab historian Ibn Khaldun (Muqaddimah, ch.2 §§ 8, 10). He declares that tribal identity is not founded diachronically on the pedigrees (ansiib), so much prized by the Arabs, but on a synchronic solidarity feeling, expressed in the sharing of common rights and common obligations. He notes that there have been known cases of a man changing his tribal identity and attaching himself to a tribe with which he has no genealogical link; such a person is at first treated by his new
Vetus Testamentum – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1986
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.