Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Pentateuchal Patterns: a Reply To P. R. Davies and D. M. Gunn

Pentateuchal Patterns: a Reply To P. R. Davies and D. M. Gunn PENTATEUCHAL PATTERNS: A REPLY TO P. R. DAVIES AND D. M. GUNN by C. J. LABUSCHAGNE Groningen Let me begin by expressing my gratitude that I was given the op- portunity to write a reply to the article "Pentateuchal patterns" by P. R. Davies and D. M. Gunn on pp. 399-406 of the present issue of VT. Since I am working on a book about divine speech in the Pen- tateuch, I shall not deal here with all the misunderstandings in this article, but confine myself to making a few comments in order to clear up some main points. Before I do so, I want to thank the writers for their criticism from which I have gained profit in spite of their scepticism and their opposition to what I have written. Their reaction makes me feel constrained to admit that I have not made it easy for the readers of my article in hT 32 (1982), pp. 268-96, because I assumed too much, took too many things for granted. This unfortunately led to formulations containing assump- tions that were clear to myself but not necessarily to every reader. The reason for this is that when I became aware of http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Vetus Testamentum Brill

Pentateuchal Patterns: a Reply To P. R. Davies and D. M. Gunn

Vetus Testamentum , Volume 34 (4): 7 – Jan 1, 1984

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/pentateuchal-patterns-a-reply-to-p-r-davies-and-d-m-gunn-OFp9HOWTMG

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0042-4935
eISSN
1568-5330
DOI
10.1163/156853384x00313
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PENTATEUCHAL PATTERNS: A REPLY TO P. R. DAVIES AND D. M. GUNN by C. J. LABUSCHAGNE Groningen Let me begin by expressing my gratitude that I was given the op- portunity to write a reply to the article "Pentateuchal patterns" by P. R. Davies and D. M. Gunn on pp. 399-406 of the present issue of VT. Since I am working on a book about divine speech in the Pen- tateuch, I shall not deal here with all the misunderstandings in this article, but confine myself to making a few comments in order to clear up some main points. Before I do so, I want to thank the writers for their criticism from which I have gained profit in spite of their scepticism and their opposition to what I have written. Their reaction makes me feel constrained to admit that I have not made it easy for the readers of my article in hT 32 (1982), pp. 268-96, because I assumed too much, took too many things for granted. This unfortunately led to formulations containing assump- tions that were clear to myself but not necessarily to every reader. The reason for this is that when I became aware of

Journal

Vetus TestamentumBrill

Published: Jan 1, 1984

There are no references for this article.