Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
112 Can <& 1) be right? Some particular bird-name is surely wanted. Very tentatively I propose ol £x«ioi, which owing to its rarity might have occasioned a marginal gloss lpvia. At an early stage would have been displaced by lpvsa in the text, itself remaining in the margin where, by its likeness to it would make the later corruption of xoTTOV still more enticing. The absurdity of the result might have escaped an Egyptian scribe. [The word eatta is found elsewhere only in MARTIAL 13.69.1. The Oxford Latin Dictionary 2) defines it as "(app.) An edible species of bird"]. 8 Chaucer Road, Bedford G. M. LEE EINE WEITERE KURZBEMERKUNG ZU 1 SAMUEL XIV 41 In seinem Kurzbeitrag in IrT. XIX, Okt. 1969, S. 493-498, hat A. TOEG nochmals den Wert des LXX-Textes von 1 Samuel xiv 41 hervorgehoben 3). Einerseits wird 1 Sam. xiv 41 von vielen Exe- geten 4) fur einen klassischen Fall von homoioteleuton gehalten und man beruft sich auf den im allgemeinen besseren LXX-Samueltext 5), 1) The Syriac (ed. LAGARDE, 1861) gives "and the ravens". Origen's is attractive, because, if had been accidentally omitted and supplied in the margin, it could have given rise to One
Vetus Testamentum – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1971
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.