Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Some False Clues in the Study of Genesis Xiv

Some False Clues in the Study of Genesis Xiv SOME FALSE CLUES IN THE STUDY OF GENESIS XIV 1) BY J. A. EMERTON Cambridge Any light that can be shed on the obscure fourteenth chapter of Genesis is welcome. From time to time, two types of theory have been advanced, either of which, if it could be proved, would be very significant for the study of the passage and of the events recorded in it. The first type of theory is that the chapter is in verse, or at least shows signs of being based on a poetic original. The proof of such a theory would be of importance for the historian, for it would help him to understand the form in which the tradition was transmitted, and might strengthen the case for believing that reliable material was handed down over a period of some centuries. A comparison might be made with the Homeric poems, which preserved by means of their poetic form many historical reminiscences through several hundred years of oral transmission, although they also contain much that is later 2). The second type ot theory is that the chapter betrays evidence ot being based on an Accadian original written in the cuneiform script, and there can http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Vetus Testamentum Brill

Some False Clues in the Study of Genesis Xiv

Vetus Testamentum , Volume 21 (1): 24 – Jan 1, 1971

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/some-false-clues-in-the-study-of-genesis-xiv-jG4Yw9JmZB

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0042-4935
eISSN
1568-5330
DOI
10.1163/156853371x00533
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

SOME FALSE CLUES IN THE STUDY OF GENESIS XIV 1) BY J. A. EMERTON Cambridge Any light that can be shed on the obscure fourteenth chapter of Genesis is welcome. From time to time, two types of theory have been advanced, either of which, if it could be proved, would be very significant for the study of the passage and of the events recorded in it. The first type of theory is that the chapter is in verse, or at least shows signs of being based on a poetic original. The proof of such a theory would be of importance for the historian, for it would help him to understand the form in which the tradition was transmitted, and might strengthen the case for believing that reliable material was handed down over a period of some centuries. A comparison might be made with the Homeric poems, which preserved by means of their poetic form many historical reminiscences through several hundred years of oral transmission, although they also contain much that is later 2). The second type ot theory is that the chapter betrays evidence ot being based on an Accadian original written in the cuneiform script, and there can

Journal

Vetus TestamentumBrill

Published: Jan 1, 1971

There are no references for this article.