Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

2 Kings Xviii 14-16 and the Annals of Sennacherib

2 Kings Xviii 14-16 and the Annals of Sennacherib SHORT NOTES 2 KINGS XVIII 14-16 AND THE ANNALS OF SENNACHERIB Professor John BRIGHT argues 1) that in the complex 2 Kings xviii 13-xix 37 2) only xviii 14-16 corresponds with The Annals of Sennacherib 3), and that this passage 'parallels perfectly' the Assyrian record: 'no mentionable conflict exists between the two'. BRIGHT concludes that xviii 14-16 refers to Sennacherib's western campaign in 701 B.C. The rest of the complex then refers to an attack on Jerusalem, and a remarkable deliverance of the city, towards the end of Sen- nacherib's reign, about 688 BC. BRIGHT gives a good review of previous attempts made by scholars to sort out the material in xviii 13-xix 37. No attempt at reconstruction can be made in a short study such as this. Suffice it so say, in connection with the supposed campaign of 688 BC, that it is unsatisfactory to postulate an event for which there is no evidence whatever 4). The purpose of this note is simply to question whether 'no men- tionable conflict exists' between the two sources equated by BRIGHT. xviii 14-16 does not mention a siege of Jerusalem 5). Quite the opposite. Hezekiah sued for terms when Sennacherib http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Vetus Testamentum Brill

2 Kings Xviii 14-16 and the Annals of Sennacherib

Vetus Testamentum , Volume 21 (5): 604 – Jan 1, 1971

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/2-kings-xviii-14-16-and-the-annals-of-sennacherib-5bp60q4EMl

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 1971 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0042-4935
eISSN
1568-5330
DOI
10.1163/156853371X00218
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

SHORT NOTES 2 KINGS XVIII 14-16 AND THE ANNALS OF SENNACHERIB Professor John BRIGHT argues 1) that in the complex 2 Kings xviii 13-xix 37 2) only xviii 14-16 corresponds with The Annals of Sennacherib 3), and that this passage 'parallels perfectly' the Assyrian record: 'no mentionable conflict exists between the two'. BRIGHT concludes that xviii 14-16 refers to Sennacherib's western campaign in 701 B.C. The rest of the complex then refers to an attack on Jerusalem, and a remarkable deliverance of the city, towards the end of Sen- nacherib's reign, about 688 BC. BRIGHT gives a good review of previous attempts made by scholars to sort out the material in xviii 13-xix 37. No attempt at reconstruction can be made in a short study such as this. Suffice it so say, in connection with the supposed campaign of 688 BC, that it is unsatisfactory to postulate an event for which there is no evidence whatever 4). The purpose of this note is simply to question whether 'no men- tionable conflict exists' between the two sources equated by BRIGHT. xviii 14-16 does not mention a siege of Jerusalem 5). Quite the opposite. Hezekiah sued for terms when Sennacherib

Journal

Vetus TestamentumBrill

Published: Jan 1, 1971

There are no references for this article.