Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Grant (1991)
The Dairy Industry: An International Comparison
R. Garner (1993)
Animals, politics, and morality
H. Herzog (1993)
“The Movement Is My Life”: The Psychology of Animal Rights ActivismJournal of Social Issues, 49
R. Rhodes, D. Marsh (1992)
Policy Networks in British Politics
Grant Jordan (1990)
Sub-Governments, Policy Communities and NetworksJournal of Theoretical Politics, 2
Larry Janssen (1988)
Private Interests, Public Policy, and American Agriculture
Kenneth Shapiro (1994)
The Caring Sleuth: Portrait of an Animal Rights ActivistSociety & Animals, 2
Jack Walker (1983)
The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups in AmericaAmerican Political Science Review, 77
R. Garner (1993)
Political Animals: A Survey of the Animal Protection Movement in BritainParliamentary Affairs, 46
R. Salisbury (1969)
An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups, 13
Michael Mills (1992)
The Politics of Dietary Change
J. Coppock, P. Lowe, G. Cox, M. MacEwen, T. O'Riordan, M. Winter, W. Adams (1986)
Countryside Conflicts: The Politics of Farming, Forestry and Conservation@@@Nature's Place: Conservation Sites and Countryside ChangeTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 12
J. Berry (1978)
Lobbying for the people
R. Golembiewski, M. Olson (1965)
The Logic of Collective Action
Martin Smith (1990)
The politics of agricultural support in Britain: the development of the agricultural policy community.
J. Jasper, Jane Poulsen (1993)
Fighting back: Vulnerabilities, blunders, and countermobilization by the targets in three animal rights campaignsSociological Forum, 8
<jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This article seeks to provide a research agenda for the study of animal protection politics. It looks firstly at the animal protection movement's organization and maintenance in the context of Olson's theory of collective action. While existing research suggests that activists tend to be recruited because of the purposive and expressive benefits they offer rather than the material ones emphasized by Olson, these alternative forms of selective incentives can hinder the achievement of the movement's goals. Secondly, the article outlines alternative models of policy-making and shows how they might be operationalized to explain the development of animal welfare policy-making in Britain and the United States. Preliminary observations suggest thatBritain's animal welfare record is more substantial because policy communities have been able to manage and limit change through concessions and cooptation. No such mechanism is available in the American political system where the greater openness and fragmentation often results in severe confrontation and ultimately, stalemate.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
Society & Animals – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1995
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.