Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
71 Abstraction faite de ces remarques critiques, le livre de M. Meautis, comme tous ses autres ouvrages, n'en reste pas moins un livre agreablement ecrit qui m6rite une lecture interessee. AMSTERDAM, Beethovenstraat 74 II. J. VAN DE RAA ,,Elle aurait pu faire ce raisonnement plus tôt." M. Méautis cependant ne cite Masqueray qu'en partie, car il apparaît de ce qui suit que Masqueray n'a pas du tout jugé sévèrement; il s'explique seulement en termes moins lyriques que M. Méautis. DE NOVIS LIBRIS IUDICIA I. M. LINFORTH, Antigone and Creon (Univ. of California Publ. in Class. Philology, XV 5, pp. 183-260). Berkeley, Univ. of California Press, 1961. Pr. D. 1.50. The author's papers on Sophocles 1) always deserve careful consideration. Based on 'close reading' of the text they present us with much more than with a broad survey of L.'s views of the different plays: they constitute in fact a very helpful contribution to the interpretation of Sophoclean tragedy. The present study mainly consists of an examination of the Antigone, in which the author is at pains to show the dramatic significance of each part in connection with the play as a whole. Much attention is paid to the
Mnemosyne – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1963
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.