Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
- FER AND -GER THEIR EXTRAORDINARY PREPONDERANCE AMONG COMPOUNDS IN ROMAN POETRY BY J. C. ARENS . Cordier 1) discussing poetic laniger refers to prosaic ep[.ocp6poc 2). This reference is typical of the approach of most students towards the compounds in -fer and -ger. Starting from the formal equivalence of -fer and -epopee, they tacitly imply a total equivalence. Their recipe in dealing with compounds in -fer would seem to run as follows: on meeting a -ler compound translate its first component into its literal Greek equivalent, add to this check up the findings of this compound in the Greek authors, and you are bound to have traced the Latin compound to its fountainhead. Is not Latin poetry mod- elled upon Greek poetry? Are not the Latin poets, docti sermones utriusque linguae, steeped in Greek literature? We seem entitled, therefore, to put the compounds in -fer and the compounds in -popoq on a level. If we confine ourselves to a partial, to a formal equalization: summum ius; but if we imply a total, a functional as well as a formal equalization: summa iniuria. Cum duo faciunt idem, lion est idem. First let us inquire into the frequency of the
Mnemosyne – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1950
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.