Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Dead Sea Scrolls Translated: The Qumran Texts in English, by Florentino García Martínez. Second Edition. Leiden: E.J. Brill; Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1996. Pp. lxvii + 519. $30.00. ISBN 90-04-10589-1 (Brill); 0-8028-4193-7 (Eerdmans)

The Dead Sea Scrolls Translated: The Qumran Texts in English, by Florentino García Martínez.... 336 of the differences between the two. More odd still is the failure, in contrast, to give more attention to 2 Sam. 7:13-14 (pp. 163-64), despite the obvious parallels of Son to God and eternal kingdom, as also in 4Q174. It looks some- what as though the earlier version of the chapter (contributed to the de Jonge Festschrift) has been too loosely inserted into the present volume. Most sur- prising is the summary conclusion drawn on p. 173, that "the 'Son of God' text from Qumran suggests that Daniel 7 was understood with reference to a Davidic messiah from an early point." That Collins has something of an idée fixe on the Danielic son of man is confirmed by the last main chapter devoted to this very subject. Here again the argument has some significantly weak points. What the Similitudes of Enoch and 4 Ezra 13 show is that in the second half of the first century CE Daniel 7 was drawn in to speculation regarding redeemer figures. They do not show that Daniel 7 had been so used before. The lack of the characteristic ele- ments ("son of man" phrase and talk of coming in clouds) outside http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Dead Sea Discoveries Brill

The Dead Sea Scrolls Translated: The Qumran Texts in English, by Florentino García Martínez. Second Edition. Leiden: E.J. Brill; Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1996. Pp. lxvii + 519. $30.00. ISBN 90-04-10589-1 (Brill); 0-8028-4193-7 (Eerdmans)

Dead Sea Discoveries , Volume 3 (3): 336 – Jan 1, 1996

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/the-dead-sea-scrolls-translated-the-qumran-texts-in-english-by-UyhZAiHQRk

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 1996 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0929-0761
eISSN
1568-5179
DOI
10.1163/156851796X00110
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

336 of the differences between the two. More odd still is the failure, in contrast, to give more attention to 2 Sam. 7:13-14 (pp. 163-64), despite the obvious parallels of Son to God and eternal kingdom, as also in 4Q174. It looks some- what as though the earlier version of the chapter (contributed to the de Jonge Festschrift) has been too loosely inserted into the present volume. Most sur- prising is the summary conclusion drawn on p. 173, that "the 'Son of God' text from Qumran suggests that Daniel 7 was understood with reference to a Davidic messiah from an early point." That Collins has something of an idée fixe on the Danielic son of man is confirmed by the last main chapter devoted to this very subject. Here again the argument has some significantly weak points. What the Similitudes of Enoch and 4 Ezra 13 show is that in the second half of the first century CE Daniel 7 was drawn in to speculation regarding redeemer figures. They do not show that Daniel 7 had been so used before. The lack of the characteristic ele- ments ("son of man" phrase and talk of coming in clouds) outside

Journal

Dead Sea DiscoveriesBrill

Published: Jan 1, 1996

There are no references for this article.