Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Theoretical Generality, Case Particularity: Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Trade Union Growth and Decline1

Theoretical Generality, Case Particularity: Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Trade Union... Theoretical Generality, Case Particularity: Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Trade Union Growth and Decline1 LARRY J. GRIFFIN* CHRISTOPHER BOTSKO and ANA-MARIA WAHL** LARRY W. ISAAC*** ABSTRACT This papers makes three points and offers one demonstration. First, the selection of cases in comparative research ideally should capture all of the variation that exists in a theorized population of interest, and not be based merely on data convenience, the presence or absence of the instance under analysis, or assumptions about causal invariance or the representativeness of cases. Second, partly due to flawed case-selection criteria and partly due to overly generous or overly restrictive logic used in determining causality, neither traditional "small-N" qualitative designs nor conventional "large-N" quantitative research designs are optimal for many comparative problems. Third, a relatively new causal comparative methodology based on a data reduction logic rooted in Boolean algebra-Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)- appears of substantial utility in those research sites with relatively large number of cases, causal heterogeneity, and the expectation of delimited theoretical generalizations. These points are then demonstrated through a QCA analysis of comparative patterns of growth and decline of trade union membership across the 18 largest, politically stable capitalist democracies in the 1970s and 1980s. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Comparative Sociology (in 2002 continued as Comparative Sociology) Brill

Theoretical Generality, Case Particularity: Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Trade Union Growth and Decline1

Download PDF
27 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/theoretical-generality-case-particularity-qualitative-comparative-3KVG0OBL9c

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
© 1991 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
ISSN
0020-7152
eISSN
1745-2554
DOI
10.1163/002071591X00069
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Theoretical Generality, Case Particularity: Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Trade Union Growth and Decline1 LARRY J. GRIFFIN* CHRISTOPHER BOTSKO and ANA-MARIA WAHL** LARRY W. ISAAC*** ABSTRACT This papers makes three points and offers one demonstration. First, the selection of cases in comparative research ideally should capture all of the variation that exists in a theorized population of interest, and not be based merely on data convenience, the presence or absence of the instance under analysis, or assumptions about causal invariance or the representativeness of cases. Second, partly due to flawed case-selection criteria and partly due to overly generous or overly restrictive logic used in determining causality, neither traditional "small-N" qualitative designs nor conventional "large-N" quantitative research designs are optimal for many comparative problems. Third, a relatively new causal comparative methodology based on a data reduction logic rooted in Boolean algebra-Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)- appears of substantial utility in those research sites with relatively large number of cases, causal heterogeneity, and the expectation of delimited theoretical generalizations. These points are then demonstrated through a QCA analysis of comparative patterns of growth and decline of trade union membership across the 18 largest, politically stable capitalist democracies in the 1970s and 1980s.

Journal

International Journal of Comparative Sociology (in 2002 continued as Comparative Sociology) – Brill

Published: Jan 1, 1991

There are no references for this article.