Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/karger/accuracy-of-a-slide-profiler-for-endocervical-cell-detection-in-no-RWQkOJlScn
References (10)
-
C. Marshall, L. Rowe, J. Bentz (1999)
Improved quality‐control detection of false‐negative pap smears using the Autopap 300 QC systemDiagnostic Cytopathology, 20
-
L. Koss, M. Sherman, Michael Cohen, Allen Anes, T. Darragh, L. Lemos, Betty McClellan, D. Rosenthal, S. Keyhani‐Rofagha, K. Schreiber, P. Valente (1997)
Significant reduction in the rate of false-negative cervical smears with neural network-based technology (PAPNET Testing System).Human pathology, 28 10
-
D. Wilbur, M. Prey, W. Miller, G. Pawlick, T. Colgan (1998)
The AutoPap System for Primary Screening in Cervical CytologyActa Cytologica, 42
-
R. Kurman, D. Solomon (1994)
The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical/Vaginal Cytologic Diagnoses: Definitions, Criteria, and Explanatory Notes for Terminology and Specimen Adequacy -
O. Abulafia, D. Sherer (1999)
Automated cervical cytology: meta-analyses of the performance of the PAPNET system.Obstetrical & gynecological survey, 54 4
-
T. Colgan, S. Patten, James Lee (1995)
A clinical trial of the AutoPap 300 QC system for quality control of cervicovaginal cytology in the clinical laboratory.Acta cytologica, 39 6
-
D. Solomon, D. Davey, R. Kurman, A. Moriarty, D. O'connor, M. Prey, S. Raab, M. Sherman, D. Wilbur, Thomas Wright, N. Young (2002)
The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology.JAMA, 287 16
-
J. Bishop, R. Kaufman, D. Taylor (1999)
Multicenter Comparison of Manual and Automated Screening of AutoCyte Gynecologic PreparationsActa Cytologica, 43
-
H. Mitchell (2001)
Longitudinal analysis of histologic high‐grade disease after negative cervical cytology according to endocervical statusCancer Cytopathology, 93
-
A. Bos, M. Ballegooijen, M. Marle, A. Hanselaar, G. Oortmarssen, J. Habbema (2001)
Endocervical status is not predictive of the incidence of cervical cancer in the years after negative smears.American journal of clinical pathology, 115 6
- Publisher
- Karger
- Copyright
- © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
- ISSN
- 0001-5547
- eISSN
- 1938-2650
- DOI
- 10.1159/000326575
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Acta Cytologica Accuracy of a Slide Profiler for Endocervical Cell Detection in No-Further-Review Conventional Pap Smears Leslie R. Rowe, C.T.(ASCP), C. Jay Marshall, M.D., Michael Berry, C.T.(ASCP), Melissa A. Larson, C.T.(ASCP), and Joel S. Bentz, M.D. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of the Focal- CONCLUSION: The reliability of a negative Focal- TM TM Point slide profiler (TriPath Care Technolgies, Point determination for endocervical cells is limited. Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) in determinating Manual screening of NFR slides designated by the in- the absence of endocervical strument as lacking endocer- cells in conventional Pap vical cells appears to be nec- smear slides. Laboratory implementation of a essary. (Acta Cytol 2003; STUDY DESIGN: A con- 47:602–605) policy to manually screen selected secutive series of convention- [slide profiler] NFR cases is al Pap smears, designated by Keywords: cervix neo- TM FocalPoint as requiring plasms, Papanicolaou warranted.... no further review (NFR) and smear, mass screening, as lacking endocervical cells, computer-assisted diag- TM was manually screened to determine the true presence or nosis, FocalPoint . absence of endocervical cells. These results were com- TM pared to those obtained by FocalPoint . Automated screening technology has been shown RESULTS: From January 1, 2000, to December
Journal
Acta Cytologica – Karger
Published: Jan 1, 2011