Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
U. Lichtenthaler, Eckhard Lichtenthaler (2009)
A Capability-Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive CapacityWiley-Blackwell: Journal of Management Studies
H. Chesbrough, Adrienne Crowther (2006)
Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other IndustriesWiley-Blackwell: R&D Management
Ulrika Westergren, J. Holmström (2012)
Exploring preconditions for open innovation: Value networks in industrial firmsInf. Organ., 22
K. Dittrich, G. Duysters (2007)
Networking as a Means to Strategy Change: The Case of Open Innovation in Mobile TelephonyJournal of Product Innovation Management, 24
Soile Juujärvi, Kaija Pesso (2013)
Actor Roles in an Urban Living Lab: What Can We Learn from Suurpelto, Finland?Technology Innovation Management Review, 3
Jong Jpj, W. Vanhaverbeke, Vrande Vja, Rochemont Mh (2009)
Open innovation in SMEs : trends, motives and management challengesSteel and Composite Structures
P. Kristensson, Peter Magnusson, B. Edvardsson, Erik Sundström (2012)
Customer Integration within Service Development : A review of methods and an analysis of insitu and exsitu contributions
I. Mulder, D. Velthausz, Martijn Kriens, Telematica Instituut (2008)
THE LIVING LABS HARMONIZATION CUBE: COMMUNICATING LIVING LABS' ESSENTIALS
Niklas Kviselius, P. Andersson (2009)
Living Labs as Tools for Open InnovationEntrepreneurship
H. Chesbrough (2006)
Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape
Anna Ståhlbröst (2012)
A set of key principles to assess the impact of Living LabsInternational Journal of Product Development, 17
H. Chesbrough (2003)
Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology
Wesley Cohen, Daniel Levinthal (1990)
ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATIONAdministrative Science Quarterly, 35
T. Veer, Annika Lorenz, K. Blind (2012)
How Open is Too Open? The ‘Dark Side’ of Openness Along the Innovation Value ChainSources of Innovation eJournal
M. Mulvenna, Suzanne Martin, Donal McDade, Eileen Beamish, A. Oliveira, Anna Kivilehto (2011)
TRAIL Living Labs Survey 2011: A survey of the ENOLL living labs
H. Chesbrough, Kevin Schwartz (2007)
Innovating Business Models with Co-Development PartnershipsResearch-Technology Management, 50
Peter Gianiodis, S. Ellis, E. Secchi (2010)
Advancing a Typology of Open InnovationInternational Journal of Innovation Management, 14
S. Leminen, M. Westerlund, Anna-Greta Nyström (2012)
Living labs as open-innovation networksTechnology Innovation Management Review, 2
M. Westerlund, S. Leminen (2011)
Managing the Challenges of Becoming an Open Innovation Company: Experiences from Living LabsTechnology Innovation Management Review, 1
Kari-Hans Kommonen, Andrea Botero (2013)
Are the Users Driving, and How Open is Open? Experiences from Living Lab and User Driven Innovation projectsJ. Community Informatics, 9
H. Meer (2007)
Open Innovation – The Dutch Treat: Challenges in Thinking in Business ModelsCreativity and Innovation Management, 16
M. Pallot, K. Pawar (2012)
A holistic model of user experience for living lab experiential design2012 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation
Bastiaan Baccarne, S. Logghe, Carina Veeckman, D. Schuurman (2013)
Why collaborate in long-term innovation research? An exploration of user motivations in Living Labs
R. Santoro, Marco Conte (2009)
Living Labs in Open Innovation Functional Regions2009 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE)
Ellen Enkel, O. Gassmann, H. Chesbrough (2009)
Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the PhenomenonNew Institutional Economics
M. Bogers, Allan Afuah, B. Bastian (2009)
Users as Innovators: A Review, Critique, and Future Research DirectionsJournal of Management, 36
C. Deutsch (2013)
The Seeking Solutions Approach: Solving Challenging Business Problems with Local Open InnovationTechnology Innovation Management Review, 3
Yair Holtzman, J. Anderberg (2011)
Diversify your teams and collaborate: because great minds don't think alikeJournal of Management Development, 30
H. Schaffers, C. Merz, Javier Guzmán (2009)
Living labs as instruments for business and social innovation in rural areas2009 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE)
Marcus Keupp, O. Gassmann (2009)
Determinants and Archetype Users of Open InnovationNew Institutional Economics
M. Pino, Victoria Cristancho-Lacroix, H. Kerhervé, Mélodie Boulay, Grégory Legouverneur, Y.-H. Wu, S. Damnée, Hermine Lenoir, A. Rigaud (2012)
Le laboratoire LUSAGE : un exemple de Living Lab dans le domaine des gérontechnologiesLes cahiers de l'année gérontologique, 4
Asbjørn Følstad, Sintef Ict (2008)
TOWARDS A LIVING LAB FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ONLINE COMMUNITY SERVICES
S. Leminen (2013)
Coordination and Participation in Living Lab NetworksTechnology Innovation Management Review, 3
M. Pallot, B. Trousse, Bernard Senach, D. Scapin (2010)
Living Lab Research Landscape: From User Centred Design and User Experience towards User Cocreation
M. Miles, A. Huberman (1994)
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
Anna-Greta Nyström, S. Leminen, M. Westerlund, M. Kortelainen (2014)
Actor roles and role patterns influencing innovation in living labsIndustrial Marketing Management, 43
M. Elmquist, Tobias Fredberg, S. Ollila (2009)
Exploring the field of open innovationEuropean Journal of Innovation Management, 12
I. Mulder, P. Stappers (2009)
Co-creating in practice: Results and challenges2009 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE)
P. Sloane (2011)
The brave new world of open innovationStrategic Direction, 27
K. Backer, V. López-Bassols, Catalina Martínez (2008)
Open Innovation in a Global Perspective
B. Dutilleul, F. Birrer, W. Mensink (2010)
Unpacking European Living Labs: Analysing Innovation’s Social DimensionsCentral European Journal of Public Policy, 4
Franz Tödtling, Patrick Lehner, A. Kaufmann (2008)
Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactionsTechnovation, 29
M. Herselman, M. Marais, Mmamakanye Pitse-Boshomane (2010)
Applying Living Lab Methodology to Enhance Skills in Innovation
I. Mulder (2012)
Living Labbing the Rotterdam Way: Co-Creation as an Enabler for Urban InnovationTechnology Innovation Management Review, 2
B. Bergvall-Kåreborn, Marita Holst, Anna Ståhlbröst (2009)
Concept Design with a Living Lab Approach2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
O. Gassmann, Ellen Enkel (2004)
Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes
S. Herstad, C. Bloch, B. Ebersberger (2008)
Open innovation and globalisation: Theory, evidence and implications
D. Schuurman, L. Marez (2012)
Structuring User Involvement in Panel-Based Living LabsTechnology Innovation Management Review, 2
Purpose – This paper aims to explore the role of private stakeholders in the living lab (LL) ecosystem and the relationship of private stakeholders to open innovation (OI) practices. There is extensive literature on private stakeholders and OI, but seldom mention is made on the specific question of how private stakeholders integrate OI in the context of a LL. Design/methodology/approach – The authors will analyze qualitatively how private businesses that have participated in a in situ open innovation evaluate and perceived their open innovation practices. Therefore, how they relate to open innovation. Then, the authors will identify a typology of the businesses in relation to OI. Findings – The research focused on the relationship of private stakeholders to OI in the context of in situ OI activities. The results obtained are consistent with literature on OI (Chesbrough, 2003). However, there are differences: if the elements mentioned by the respondents are described in literature, their representation of OI and its components allows us to affirm that this practice is not generalised and that it is often open to interpretation. That emphasises the importance of the role LLs can play as intermediaries to accompany private stakeholders in the OI process. Private stakeholders look for a guide to develop their OI know-how and find their way in the OI ecosystem. Originality/value – The value of this paper is to bridge the research on OI done with private organisation and the research on LLs. The research literature did not pay much attention to the representation of the private stakeholders in the OI ecosystem. This paper has provided the start to open up that field.
Info – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 8, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.