Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Donald Crane, J. Miner (1988)
Labor arbitrators’ performance: Views from union and management perspectivesJournal of Labor Research, 9
Cynthia Gramm, A. Greenfield (1990)
Arbitral standards in medical screening grievancesEmployee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 3
M. Gordon, Sandra Miller (1984)
GRIEVANCES: A REVIEW OF RESEARCH AND PRACTICEPersonnel Psychology, 37
Knoke D. (1980)
10.4135/9781412984843
C. Labig, C. Greer (1988)
Grievance initiation: A literature survey and suggestions for future researchJournal of Labor Research, 9
David Meyer, William Cooke (1988)
Economic and Political Factors in Formal Grievance ResolutionIndustrial Relations, 27
D. Dalton, W. Todor (1982)
Union steward locus of control, job, union involvement, and grievance behaviorJournal of Business Research, 10
D. Petersen (1990)
Quits, recission of quits, and constructive discharge in arbitrationEmployee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 3
D. Dalton, W. Todor (1982)
Antecedents of Grievance Filing Behavior: Attitude/Behavioral Consistency and the Union StewardAcademy of Management Journal, 25
O. Clarke (1988)
Employment Adjustment: an International PerspectiveLabour, 2
D. Mesch, D. Dalton (1991)
WORKPLACE JUSTICE OUTCOMES “IN THE NAME OF THE UNION”: A FIELD ASSESSMENTInternational Journal of Conflict Management, 2
C. Owen, W. Todor, D. Dalton (1989)
A comparison of blue- versus white-collar grievance behavior: A field assessmentEmployee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2
W. Todor, C. Owen (1991)
Deriving benefits from conflict resolution: A macrojustice assessmentEmployee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4
Brian Bemmels (1990)
Arbitrator characteristics and arbitrator decisionsJournal of Labor Research, 11
D. Dalton, W. Todor (1985)
GENDER AND WORKPLACE JUSTICE: A FIELD ASSESSMENTPersonnel Psychology, 38
C. Scott, Elizabeth Shadoan (1989)
The effect of gender on arbitration decisionsJournal of Labor Research, 10
M. Gordon, R. Bowlby (1988)
PROPOSITIONS ABOUT GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENTS: FINALLY, CONSULTATION WITH GRIEVANTSPersonnel Psychology, 41
Prior research has argued that management has an advantage in many grievance cases largely because it enjoys the discretion to pursue these cases or otherwise as it chooses. Conversely, organized labor has far less discretion inasmuch as it must pursue serious grievances for which positive outcomes cannot reasonably be expected It was recently demonstrated that grievances filed in the name of the union may provide an important exception to this principle. This empirical assessment of arbitration cases N 520 extends these arguments from the context of the grievance to that of arbitration, an arguably more valid and generalizable context for such an assessment. The results indicate that filing in the name of the union does provide a substantive edge in arbitration outcomes, even while controlling for the various types of arbitration cases.
International Journal of Conflict Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 1, 1992
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.