Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

O'BRIEN AND OTHERS v. ASSOCIATED FIRE ALARMS LTD.

O'BRIEN AND OTHERS v. ASSOCIATED FIRE ALARMS LTD. March 1, 1968 Master and Servant Redundancy Dismissal Employees working and living in Liverpool Employers operating nationwide contract electricity business Business divided into large areas Work in Liverpool falling off Employees required to work away from home within area of operations controlled from Liverpool office Dismissal of employees refusing to work away from home area Industrial tribunal's finding of implied term in contract of employment that employees could be required to work anywhere within area controlled from local office Whether finding of fact or question of law No evidence to support Whether court entitled to review Whether dismissals by reason of redundancy Place where employed Redundancy Payments Act, 1965 c.62,ss.l,9. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Managerial Law Emerald Publishing

O'BRIEN AND OTHERS v. ASSOCIATED FIRE ALARMS LTD.

Managerial Law , Volume 4 (3): 8 – Jun 1, 1968

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/o-brien-and-others-v-associated-fire-alarms-ltd-DpSCYluK1b

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
0309-0558
DOI
10.1108/eb021514
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

March 1, 1968 Master and Servant Redundancy Dismissal Employees working and living in Liverpool Employers operating nationwide contract electricity business Business divided into large areas Work in Liverpool falling off Employees required to work away from home within area of operations controlled from Liverpool office Dismissal of employees refusing to work away from home area Industrial tribunal's finding of implied term in contract of employment that employees could be required to work anywhere within area controlled from local office Whether finding of fact or question of law No evidence to support Whether court entitled to review Whether dismissals by reason of redundancy Place where employed Redundancy Payments Act, 1965 c.62,ss.l,9.

Journal

Managerial LawEmerald Publishing

Published: Jun 1, 1968

There are no references for this article.