Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The conditioning effect of objective decisionmaking on the client's capital proposal

The conditioning effect of objective decisionmaking on the client's capital proposal This paper explains how the capital proposals of large experienced clients of the UK construction industry are influenced by paradigms and perspectives. It shows how those involved in the decisiontobuild process react to stimuli caused by a need to demonstrate objective decisionmaking. The paper is taken from a 5year PhD study undertaken by the first author, which investigated the origins of the decision to build undertaken by leading clients. The clients sampled had a total annual construction budget of between 700 million and 1000 million in the year that data were collected. The product of the research was an explanation of what happens in the preproject stage, why it happens, and why it will change in the future. The significance of its conclusions is that any system designed to model or improve decisionmaking in the preproject stage must be capable of adaptation and modification as influences and considerations shift. Moreover, the need to justify decisions as objective empowers paradigms and perspectives that act as conditioning influences on the people making or shaping proposals. The paper concludes by showing that an understanding of the role played by paradigms and perspectives could allow management to rethink construction and meet the challenges put forward by Sir John Egan The Egan Report Rethinking Construction, DETR, 1998. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Engineering Construction & Architectural Management Emerald Publishing

The conditioning effect of objective decisionmaking on the client's capital proposal

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-conditioning-effect-of-objective-decisionmaking-on-the-client-s-lMGNkx3mG5

References (9)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
0969-9988
DOI
10.1108/eb021154
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper explains how the capital proposals of large experienced clients of the UK construction industry are influenced by paradigms and perspectives. It shows how those involved in the decisiontobuild process react to stimuli caused by a need to demonstrate objective decisionmaking. The paper is taken from a 5year PhD study undertaken by the first author, which investigated the origins of the decision to build undertaken by leading clients. The clients sampled had a total annual construction budget of between 700 million and 1000 million in the year that data were collected. The product of the research was an explanation of what happens in the preproject stage, why it happens, and why it will change in the future. The significance of its conclusions is that any system designed to model or improve decisionmaking in the preproject stage must be capable of adaptation and modification as influences and considerations shift. Moreover, the need to justify decisions as objective empowers paradigms and perspectives that act as conditioning influences on the people making or shaping proposals. The paper concludes by showing that an understanding of the role played by paradigms and perspectives could allow management to rethink construction and meet the challenges put forward by Sir John Egan The Egan Report Rethinking Construction, DETR, 1998.

Journal

Engineering Construction & Architectural ManagementEmerald Publishing

Published: Mar 1, 2000

There are no references for this article.